When is a Flight Deck Not a Flight Deck?

Containerized minelaying system on a River Batch 2 Offshore Patrol Vessel

It has been said that aircraft carriers are the ultimate modular warships because their primary weapons (aircraft) are interchangeable.

A flight deck on an Offshore Patrol Vessel (OPV) certainly offers a degree of aviation options. General purpose, cargo, ASW, and ASuW helicopters and a range of Unmanned Air Systems, but it appears our allies, the UK and particularly Australia may be looking at other ways to use this large open space.

Royal Navy:

Navy Lookout had a post that talked about restoring a naval mining capability in the Royal Navy. There was no specific reference to using flight decks or to Offshore Patrol Vessels.

The RN does not need dedicated minelaying vessels. The SSNs have a theoretical minelaying capability but XLUUVs are a much lower risk and stealthier solution for covert and sensitive missions. Where stealth is less important, containerised minelaying solutions are being developed that can be secured to the deck and dispense mines over the stern. (emphasis applied–Chuck)

But the photo, above, definitely got my attention. There we see an SH Defence “CUBE” containerized mine laying system developed by RWM Italia S.p,A. (Rheinmetall). on the flight deck of a River Batch 2 Offshore Patrol Vessel (HMS TAMAR).

Australian Navy:

Australia is planning to produce up to 14 flight deck equipped Arafura class OPVs including two intended specifically for Mine Counter Measures (MCM). These ships were always intended to accept containerized mission loads. It appears they are now planning what these ships will do in wartime.

Missile Launcher:

We already saw “Australia Considering Modular C-Dome For Arafura OPVs” –Naval News

Australia Considering Modular C-Dome For Arafura OPVs
Illustration of Arafura-class OPV fitted with C-DOME

Mine Layer:

As noted in the Navy Lookout, Australia is planning to buy and produce large numbers of mines. Naval News reports,

“Australia is set to accelerate the procurement of sea mines as part of Project SEA 2000…The decision to rapidly procure the capability, reportedly from a European supplier, will deliver a ‘significant’ deterrent effect according to Defence…it’s understood that the government has budgeted approximately $500 million to 1 billion Australian dollars for the acquisition…the weapons being brought are smart mines, able to disseminate between civilian vessels and a variety of military targets, allowing a strategic anchorage to be denied to hostile forces, all the while preserving access for aligned vessels(emphasis applied–Chuck)

This all points to large numbers of mines being used in defensive fields. Such minefields will almost certainly be laid by surface vessels. Australia does have some civilian crewed support ships that might be used for mine laying, but as the Arafura class comes online, they will be the most likely surface minelayers.

SURTASS-E:

SURTASS-E. (U.S Department of Defense)

Then there is these reports from Naval News and The Drive that Australia is getting SURTASS-E systems.

SURTASS-E is expected to provide long range detection and cuing for tactical weapons, against both diesel- and nuclear-powered submarines. Again, the Arafura class seems a likely host, because the system is intended for military crew manning and, unlike the civilian manned National Support Squadron ships, these ships are armed and have communication systems that include tactical data link.

Now About the Coast Guard:

Using a flight deck for non-aviation purposes is not a foreign idea to the Coast Guard. They do it all the time to provide a holding area for migrants. 

USCGC Mohawk’s (WMEC 913) crew patrols the South Florida Straits during Operation Vigilant Sentry, Jan. 5, 2023. Mohawk’s crew patrolled the Florida Straits and Caribbean Sea in support of Homeland Security Task Force—Southeast and Operation Vigilant Sentry in the Coast Guard Seventh District’s area of operations for a 46-day patrol. (U.S. Coast Guard photo by USCGC Legare (WMEC 912)

9 thoughts on “When is a Flight Deck Not a Flight Deck?

  1. Hi Chuck,

    Again another informative post. One point of issue, is the 14 Arafura’s mentioned above. My understanding is there is to be 12 OPV Arafuras, and 8 more for mine counter measures and hydrographic survey versions based on the Arafura Class. Haven’t seen 14 mentioned, just 12 and 20. Has there been a new announcement increasing the number of Arafura’s in OPV version?

    Andrew

    • @Andrew. I got the number 14 from Wikipedia. It included 12 OPVs and 2 for Mine Counter Measures (MCM). Sounds like the Australians may have added 6 additional for MCM.

  2. One would humbly suggest that is what the space under the flight deck should be used for.

    It isn’t just carriers that carry air craft. Escorts carry aircraft too The helicopter is probably the ultimate module. But then again the VLS silo is a module system. Or gas turbines that can be exchanged via the uptakes are modules too.

    I am constantly amused about all these calls to make warships more modular because I can’t see how they can be any more modular.

    • The Australian OPVs do have space below the flight deck. Normally there is a relatively large boat there, but they do have a lot of flexibility. The River class and many other OPVs don’t have comparable reconfigurable space.

    • I think “modular” is PowerPoint for “Have multi-mission ships switch between specializing in missions faster than they can in real life”.

      • If previously trained personnel don’t come aboard with the systems, then, yes, it will take a long time for the ship to come up to speed. Trained operators and maintainers have to be part of the “module.”

  3. Pingback: “Navy makes sure helicopters cannot land on new Offshore Patrol Vessels” –The Australian | Chuck Hill's CG Blog

  4. Pingback: “Israeli Navy reveals Reshef corvette plans” –Naval News | Chuck Hill's CG Blog

Leave a comment