The Commmandant Answers–Future of WLR, WLI, WLIC, WTGB, WYTL

Shortly after the “State of the Coast Guard” address, the Commandant contacted us and offered to take some questions. Ryan Erickson, Bill Wells, and I took advantage of this generous offer and generated several–probably more than we should have. We may have overloaded the system, but the Commandant is being a good sport and says he will answer them all. Rather than try to answer them all at once, which would make for a very long post, they will come out individually or in small groups. This is the first:

Is there a plan for replacement or life extension for the old small
ships, including the WLR, WLI, WLIC, WTGB, WYTL?

The President’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 budget request includes funds for the completion
of engineering change work, materials purchasing and production for the first 140-foot
WTGB Ice Breaking Tug Service Life Extension Project (SLEP).  The goal is to add 15
years to the service life of the 140s.  We are not looking at a replacement project for the
140 fleet at this time.

In FY 2009, we were appropriated $5 million to begin the Inland River Tender
Recapitalization Project (formerly the Heartland Waterway Vessel Project), which is
planned to cover the WLR, WLIC & WLI classes.  Since that time, we have completed
the necessary mission analysis reports and drafted the mission needs statements.  The
U.S. Coast Guard and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Marine Design Center in
Philadelphia are collaborating on various Inland Fleet studies including some notional
designs.

There are currently no plans to replace the 65-foot WYTL Harbor Tugs.

4 thoughts on “The Commmandant Answers–Future of WLR, WLI, WLIC, WTGB, WYTL

  1. The President’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 budget request includes funds for the completion
    of engineering change work, materials purchasing and production for the first 140-foot
    WTGB Ice Breaking Tug Service Life Extension Project (SLEP). The goal is to add 15
    years to the service life of the 140s. We are not looking at a replacement project for the
    140 fleet at this time.
    Query: How much money per 14o?
    BTW – Calling a WTGB old makes me ancient….ugh.

    • The budget break out here: http://cgblog.org/2011/02/17/the-fy2012-aci-budget-request-for-vessels-2/

      There is $14M for “In Service Vessel Sustainment” that this refers to. That is in addition to $6M for survey and design work that will also be used to begin planning refurbishment for the 225-foot Sea-Going Buoy Tenders (WLBs) and the 175- foot Coastal Buoy Tenders (WLMs), in addition to the WTGBs.

      The first six of the WTGBs are over 30 years old. I helped set up precomm training for them, so I know what you mean.

  2. When I took command of STURGEON BAY we were celebrating her 10th anniversary and worried about the 20+ year old sister ships. STURGEON BAY is over 22 yr and breaking ice. Hopefully, subsequent budgets will continue to fund SLEP for these cutters. They (along with our inland and ATON cutters) are truely multi mission and an excellent training platform for our sailors.

  3. Pingback: Ice Work on the Hudson 2 | tugster: a waterblog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s