The Navy is facing some hard questions regarding the declining numbers and readiness of its surface fleet. This post actually puts the best face on a hearing that has not gone well for the Navy.
Coast Guard implications?
- I still see the Coast Guard making favorable references to “optimal manning,” but it has become a dirty word in the Navy resulting in deferred maintenance, poor morale, and declining readiness.
- This is why the Department of Homeland Security can’t blithely say the Coast Guard does not need new ships because the Navy can do those jobs.
The first of perhaps several evaluations of this hearing. More info on why the Navy is no substitute for the Coast guard in peacetime. Unsaid is that the Navy will desperately need the Coast Guard to provide numbers in less demanding areas if we do go to war:
http://www.informationdissemination.net/2011/07/congressman-kissell-throws-three.html