During my recent vacation I had time to read a bit of Coast Guard history, the book “Bloodstained Sea, The U. S. Coast Guard in the Battle of the Atlantic, 1941-1944,” by Michael G. Walling. copyright 2004.
It may not capture everything the Coast Guard did in the Battle of the Atlantic, in that there is relatively little mention of the 30 Destroyer Escorts and 75 Patrol Frigates manned by the Coast Guard, but it follows the exploits of the seven 327 foot cutters in great detail. It also talks a bit about the two U-boats sunk by 165 foot cutters early in the war. So the emphasis is on the desperate early days, before US industry supplied a glut of escort vessels.
When I was XO on Duane, one of those seven 327s, I had access to here War Diaries written 40 years earlier. (Hopefully they found a home somewhere safe.) They seemed to prove the adage that “war is months of boredom punctuated by intense terror.” Most of her convoys were uneventful, the exceptions are of course the story here.
There is an almost mind numbing recitation of ships sunk, lives lost, and lives saved. Attacks on U-boats were numerous, but sinkings were few. The cutters’ achievements in this respect were quite remarkable, but what caught my attention was the number of rescues in extremely adverse conditions. In almost every case there were attempts to rescue the crews of torpedoed ships even when it put the escorts in danger.
I recently saw some figures for the loss rate for US merchant seamen compared to that of the military. One in 26 merchant seamen were lost compared with something like one in 45 for the US military. Those rescue attempts, particularly in the early years before the U-boat threat was tamed, must have been essential to maintain the morale of merchant seamen and their willingness to undertake another voyage.
Currently we are short of American flag ships and perhaps even shorter of American merchant seamen to sail them.
Less than two years ago, MARAD was told, ‘You’re on your own’: US sealift can’t count on Navy escorts in the next big war.
OK, its bad enough that there may be no escorts defending your ship, but that also means if your ship sinks, there is no one to rescue you. We can’t afford to loose the few mariners we have and we can’t put them in a situation where they have no hope of rescue if their ship is sunk. A cutter with helicopter might be a viable rescue vessel.
As noted before, I think convoy escort would be a good wartime role for upgraded National Security Cutters and Offshore Patrol Cutters.
Fortunately it does seem the Navy has at least begun to think about escorting convoys again, but all the corporate knowledge is buried somewhere in dusty vaults. They need to pull up lessons learned from the Cold War “Reforger” exercise series. The new exercise is under 2nd Fleet in the Atlantic, but frankly I think we need to worry more about the Pacific. Chinese nuclear submarines, that are at a disadvantage relative to their American counterparts, could do a lot of damage to the sea lanes in the mid-Pacific and even operate off the US coast, tying up fleet assets needed in the Western Pacific. .
A word about the upcoming movie Greyhound:
I look forward to the movie “Greyhound” staring Tom Hanks, who also wrote the screen play. It is based on one of my favorite books, “The Good Shepherd,” by C. S. Forrester, also author of the Horatio Hornblower series.
Remember, if you see it, that in 1942, the flagship for a US led mid-ocean escort group in the North Atlantic would have been a Coast Guard 327 foot cutter, usually USCGC Spencer, not a well armed US Navy destroyer, and its captain would have been a Coast Guard Officer. Early in 1942 he would also have been in charge of the escort group, but in May 1942 a Navy Captain was placed in charge of the escort group. Except for short periods, this was Capt. Paul R. Heineman. That split the responsibility, allowing the CO to concentrate on fighting his own ship.
Fantastic story. Thanks for sharing.
Inspired by true events. So not very accurate?
@Brett, The book never claimed that, but it was representative. It should be a good story. Like all movies, they will get somethings right, others not so much. After I see it I will probably come back here and score some of the inaccuracies. They are using a Fletcher class destroyer equipped as they were only in the last year of the war. 99% of the population will not know the difference so its OK.
If it helps a new generation better understand what happened, it will be a good thing.
The movie trailer shows a short range engagement between the destroyer and a U-boat. This is the real thing. https://cdrsalamander.blogspot.com/2020/03/fullbore-friday.html
In a similar situation, USCGC Campbell was almost lost after ramming a U-606, brought to the surface by depth charges from the Polish destroyer Burza.
It would be better if folks read, “Hitler’s U-Boat War” by Blair.
having servered on the cgc 909 campbell the cutters was legendary. we had a huge binder full of campbell history. a little niche with Sinbad shit being on campbell was one of my best ships, evah.
That’s really cool Chuck that you were an XO on a 327, I didn’t know that! The more I’ve been reading about those ships and their accomplishments, the more I’ve fallen in love with them. I’m looking to make a trip to Boston to tour the Taney and Key West for Ingham. And Tom Hanks’ Greyhound looks really good too.
That is why Duane in war paint is my avatar. Really enjoyed the tour. Great crew, some I still connect with by Facebook.
Going through Taney in Baltimore was excellent. They have a compartment that memorializes her sister ships as well.
Ingham sank U-626 on 17 Dec. 1942. First 327 to sink a sub.
During my vacation I also got to go aboard the USS Kidd in Baton Rouge. She is still in the same configuration she was when the war ended. With all her extra crew served weapons, she is extremely crowded inside. Made Duane look absolutely spacious. Racks even in the mess deck. The crew was probably at least 50% larger than planned.
Is that the same Ingham in the song, “Wolfpack”?
I looked up the lyrics. https://www.bing.com/search?q=lyrics+song+wolfpack&form=EDGTCT&qs=PF&cvid=764ab7bad2254f6493f6f383ed72f61e&refig=f0d324debe0c4386dd9fa67deddae4fa&cc=US&setlang=en-US&elv=AY3%21uAY7tbNNZGZ2yiGNjfPWHPet%21ol3EgSTsCfvize0cCH3Va3RMm4aHd9188XCl4o1Oa6oQ0EUL0r*aRac9YeL*U5edjDNK7wj54nWvO51&plvar=0&PC=HCTS
The song does reference a convoy action recounted in the book, page 61-65.
Gleaves was an almost brand new USN destroyer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Gleaves_(DD-423)
Bury was a designated rescue vessel, British, manned by civilians.
Spencer was involved but apparently not Ingham.
The convoy was ONS-92 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convoy_ON_92 (just 92 in the lyrics) West bound from Liverpool, departing 5 May, 1942. Convoy speed was 6 knots. U-124 opened the attack on May 11 sinking two, followed by U-94 sinking one and in a second attack U-124 sank two more. Spencer rescued those two crews. 12 May at 0330 U-406 attempted to torpedo Spencer, but the sonar operator heard the torpedoes and the OOD managed to avoid. The following night two more ships were sunk.
All together the convoy of 41 merchant ships lost 7 ships, but only 7 merchant seamen. 303 seamen had been rescued including 143 by the designated rescue vessel and 57 by Spencer.
The Wikipedia entry on ONS_92 indicates Ingham was one of the escorts, but the entry on Ingham indicates she did not escort ONS-92, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USCGC_Ingham_(WHEC-35)#Convoys_escorted
The entry on Spencer does show that she escorted ONS-92, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USCGC_Spencer_(WPG-36)#Convoys_escorted
Ingham had been in Boston at the yard and did workup before joining Spencer in Argentia.
I just could not help but wish Hanks had changed the story a bit and made his character a Coast Guard commander and his ship a 327.
Here is a link to an article about the Canadian consultant for the movie.
Pingback: “Bloodstained Sea” –a Book Review, and more on Convoys — Chuck Hill’s CG Blog – battleoftheatlantic19391945