“How to Modernize the Coast Guard Fleet” –USNI

136 Haitian refugees on the flight deck of the US Coast Guard cutter Harriet Lane

The US Naval Institute has a post that proposes a relatively radical solution to the problems the Coast Guard has had in providing maintenance for our ships.

“The first step to combat rising maintenance costs would involve decommissioning several ships, including the 210-foot Reliance– and 270-foot Famous-class WMECs, the 282-foot USCGC Alex Haley (WMEC-39), 175-foot Keeper-class buoy tenders, and 87-foot Marine Protector-class patrol boats. They should be replaced with significantly more capable ships, such as WMSLs, WPCs, and 225-foot seagoing buoy tenders.”

I don’t think that is going to happen any time soon, for a number of reasons, but in making his case he does a great job in identifying the problem.

“The Coast Guard’s budget for FY24 was $13.4 billion, a figure that severely limits the service’s operational capabilities. Consider that the Coast Guard’s budget in 2014, adjusted for inflation, was $18.5 billion—in real-dollar terms, the budget has fallen by $5.1 billion in a decade.”

If that is the case, there is no way you can maintain a fleet the same size as we had in 2014 whether the ships are new or old. Plus it is going to get worse because with the newer larger ships they will need access to dry docks that are larger and consequently more expensive and fewer in number. Increasingly we will be in competition with the Navy rather than with fishermen.

The author also points to the Coast Guard’s short planning horizon. While the Navy has a 30 year shipbuilding plan, the Coast Guard produces only a 5 year capital investment plan. The author suggests the Coast Guard return to producing a 20 year plan as was prepared for a short period. I have been recommending a 30 year plan for almost as long as I have produced the blog.

While we can’t do it in the short term, the Coast Guard needs a culture change that says we will not operate ships more than 30 years old. As they reach 30 years old, they should be declared excess property and passed to our allies who cannot afford new construction but where labor for repairs is much cheaper than here.

To make this work we have to start the process for planning for replacements when the units are 20 years old because realistically, it is 10 years from “Gee we are going to need a new WXX” to commissioning.

USCGC Bertholf was commissioned in 2008. In three years planning for her replacement should begin. That will require a real change of organizational culture.

I have seen a RFI that indicates planning has begun for the icebreaking 140 and 65 foot tug replacements.

We are probably already behind in planning replacements for the WLBs, WLMs, and WPBs.

4 thoughts on ““How to Modernize the Coast Guard Fleet” –USNI

  1. The USN reserve has to be included into the USCG. Example would be replace HC-130J/HC-27J with SC-130J/SC-27J. The USNR would man the ASW/AntiShip systems/ weapons

  2. We need to build new and make sure we avoid chances whenever necessary if the right ship for the job already exists with an ally. We really need smaller than OPC and larger than FRC.

  3. This is why we should seriously start decommissioning the 210’s and 270’s on a one for one basis. For every OPC that get’s built, a 210 or 270 get’s decommissioned and put up for sale for Foreign allied countries like Uruguay, El Savlador, Tunisia. Lebanon, Philippines and Sri Lanka.

    • Nicky I think the intention was always to decommission WMECs as OPCs became available to replace them, but they have been so delayed we have had to decommission WMECs before its replacement was completed.

      Of course we never expected to replace every WMEC with an OPC. There were 32 WMECs and only 25 OPCs were planned.

      In effect some 210s are being replaced by FRCs.

Leave a comment