Arctic Patrol Cutter?

While looking into Fincantieri’s US operation regarding the OPC, I ran across reference to an Ice Capable ship being built for the National Science Foundation. The ship is the Sikuliaq, pronounced [see-KOO-lee-auk]. It “will be a 260-foot oceanographic research ship capable of bringing scientists to the ice-choked waters of Alaska and the polar regions. When complete, the vessel will be one of the most advanced university research vessels in the world and will be able to break ice up to 2.5 feet thick. Currently under construction at Marinette Marine Corporation, a shipyard in Marinette, Wisconsin, the Sikuliaq will be ready for unrestricted science operations in 2014 and will be home ported in Alaska, at UAF’s Seward Marine Center in Seward.” More info here.

It’s only a light icebreaker and it isn’t very fast, but with a flight deck and a little more power, mightn’t this be the basis for an affordable patrol ship that can give us a seasonal presence in the Arctic? The price is reportedly $200M (revised from original post).

Length, Overall LOA 260 feet
Length, Design Waterline LWL 237 feet 0 inches
Beam, Max across reamer Bmax 52 feet
Beam, Max across hull amidship Bmidship 48 feet
Depth, Keel to Main Deck D 28 feet
Draft, Design Waterline TDWL 18 feet 9 inches
Freeboard, Design Waterline FDWL 8 feet 9 inches
Displacement at Design Waterline 3,665 long tons
Propulsion Power P 5,750 BHP

Performance

Endurance 45 days
Endurance, Hotel Only 60 days
Speed, Calm Open Water Vcalm 14.2 knots
Speed, 4 M Sea (13.1 ft) Vss 5 12.3 knots
Level Ice at 2 knots Ice thickness 3 feet

Capacities and Working Areas

Science Berths 26
Crew Berths 20
Science deadweight 100 long tons
Science/Storage Vans, 8 feet x 20 feet 2 – 4 vans
Science storage 8,000 cubic feet
Consumables:
Diesel Fuel, at 95% 170,000 gallons
Fresh Water, at 100% 13,150 gallons
Water making capacity 6,000 gallons/day
Provisions 60 days
Holding capacity 24 hours
Science Labs 2250 square feet
Deck Working Area 4360 square feet

New Small Missile System for the LCS–Coast Guard Applications?

It’s not official yet, but it looks like the Navy has found a missile system for the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS). The Navy had been planning to use a system that was being developed by the Army called Netfires, also referred to as the NLOS-LS (non-line-of-sight, launch system), but the project proved overly ambitious and expensive, and worst of all inaccurate.

The newly selected missile is the Raytheon Griffin. It is small and light, with a warhead intended to limit collateral damage, only 43″ long, weighing 33 pounds, with a 13 pound warhead. In its current form it has a relatively short surface to surface range of 5,500 meters, but there is talk of extended range version. It uses GPS for attacks against fixed targets and semi-active laser guidance against moving targets. In addition to finding a home on the LCS, it looks like all four DOD services will use it, on a wide variety of platforms, and it will be produced in very large numbers, driving the price down. The picture below shows four mounted on a HumVee. The missile is already being used by special forces units including some of their supporting C-130s. Its being used on UAVs where its light weight means that three Griffins can replace each Hellfire. Among others it is expected to be used on the Navy’s shipboard RQ-8 Fire Scout which the Coast Guard is also considering using.

Here is a pdf with more information: http://www.ausa.org/publicatio..

Navy Close to Choosing Griffin Missile for LCS

I know a lot of people will roll their eyes when I talk about giving the Coast Guard access to missiles, but think about it. This weapon can give a patrol boat stopping power that only our largest cutters have now. Perhaps more importantly, when we use force, we want it to be precise, to destroy only what we intend. The 76 mm and 57 mm guns we have on our ships now are potentially much more destructive. Even when we fire a 25 mm, .50 cal, 7.62, or an M-16, it can land thousands of yards behind the target, in places we never intended, including among innocent civilians. When you absolutely, positively, have to stop someone, this may be a better choice.

Italian OPC Design

Defense news is reporting the launch of the second of four ships being built for the Turkish Coast Guard at a total cost of $480M (same as the cost of one NSC). These ships are similar to the projected Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC) and are based on a design by Fincantieri also built for the Italian Navy (four ships) and the Italian Ministry of Transport (two ships).

Fincantieri is Italy’s leading shipbuilder, building a range of ships from aircraft carriers and frigates to offshore patrol vessels. Its Manitowoc Marine Group through its Marinette Marine shipyard, is one of nine shipbuilders that have expressed an interest in building the OPCs. They have also, in partnership with Lockheed Martin, recently been contracted for options to build ten additional Freedom (LCS-1) class ships for the Navy. Marinette Marine has also been building Coast Guard Response Boat, Mediums. Before being acquired by Fincantieri Marinette Marine also built 225 ft buoy tenders and the icebreaker Mackinaw (WLBB-30).

I haven’t been able to find out how the Turkish units are equipped. There seem to be very significant differences between the Italian Navy units and those built for the Ministry of Transport. The specs for the Italian Navy version are as follows:

  • Crew: 80 total including 8 officers
  • Overall Length: 88.4m (292 ft)
  • Length at Waterline: 80.3m (265 ft)
  • Beam: 12.2m (40.26 ft)
  • Draught: 4.6m (15.2 ft)
  • Full Load Displacement: 1,520 tons
  • Armament: 1×76 mm, 2x25mm
  • Speed: 25 knots
  • Range: 3,500 nmi
  • Helo deck and hanger for NH90 (essentially the same size as an MH-60)

Slightly smaller, with less endurance and probably not quite up to the level of seakeeping the Coast Guard has been looking for, but still interesting ships, and if they do make an offer on the OPC, their proposal is likely to be based on this design.

Marinette is also building a 260 foot ice capable vessel for the National Science Foundation. I’ll post about it soon.

Another Fisheries Dispute, This Time–Japan v. South Korea

There is another fisheries dispute based on contested sovereignty. This time it is between South Korea and Japan. The dispute is over the Liancourt Rocks, called Dokdo by the Koreans and Takeshima by the Japanese. Sounds like the Japanese may be pushing there claims on the waters sounding these rocks which the South Koreans have been administering since 1954.

To give you an idea how seriously the the South Koreans take this dispute, the largest warship in the South Korean Navy, an 18,000 ton big deck amphib, is named Dokdo.

This and other disputes, are why it is so difficult for these two countries, which would appear to be natural allies, find it so hard to work together.

Jamaica/Honduras Fishing Dispute Turns Deadly

Jamaican Coast Guard reportedly fired into a Honduran fishing vessel with the intention  of disabling it, killing the captain. Needless to say the Hondurans are upset. A report by ABCNews is here. What I found strange in the report was that the Honduran fishing vessel reportedly had 100 people on board, quite a few for a fishing vessel.

Pirates? Don’t Shoot’em, Zap’em with Lasers

What can I say, it’s a company news release, but it is interesting. It’s quoted below in its entirety:

——————————————————————————————————————-

“BAE Systems Develops Non-Lethal Laser to Defend

Against Pirate Attacks on Commercial Shipping

“10 Jan 2011 | Ref. 004/2011

Laser Distraction
Laser Distraction

“Bristol, UK: BAE Systems has successfully demonstrated a prototype device that will serve as an effective non-lethal deterrent against pirate attacks on commercial vessels such as oil tankers and container ships.

“Piracy worldwide is on the rise according to reports from the ICC’s International Maritime Bureau (IMB), with 430 attacks worldwide reported last year, up from 406 in 2009. As pirates increase their range of operations and their capabilities, commercial shipping agents are increasingly looking for ways of preventing attacks whilst avoiding armed guards on their ships.

“In order to help combat the growing piracy threat BAE Systems conducted a study of pirate’s behaviour and a company-wide capability survey. This led to the development of the concept of using a non-lethal laser, which would leave only temporary effects, to distract and deter potential attackers from a distance.

“Leveraging the capability of its Optics and Laser Technology Department within its Advanced Technology Centre, BAE System’s researchers conducted a number of experiments to assess the feasibility of laser distraction as a non-lethal weapon. The research team has now successfully demonstrated a suitable laser at the Pershore Trials Range in Worcester over a variety of distances in a variety of conditions.

“The laser beam is capable of providing a visual warning to pirates at distances greater than 2km, and of disorientating attackers sufficiently at lesser distances so that weapons cannot be targeted effectively. At all times the power levels of the laser remain eye safe.

“Roy Evans, BAE Systems capability technology lead for laser photonic systems, said: “The effect is similar to when a fighter pilot attacks from the direction of the sun. The glare from the laser is intense enough to make it impossible to aim weapons like AK47s or RPGs, but doesn’t have a permanent effect.”

“The laser was trialled during night and day in varying weather conditions at the Worcester facility. Cameras were placed at the target location to demonstrate the level of beam intensity and divergence produced by the test runs. Beam oscillation techniques were also demonstrated.

“The researchers have developed a bespoke Neodymium Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser which is an effective deterrent at relatively low power levels. By utilising targeting systems and changing beam patterns, the distraction effect can be made more pronounced and be used against multiple targets.

“Evans continued: “We successfully showed that the laser works not just during the night, but also in full daylight. But, there are many more requirements to meet before placing a non-lethal laser weapon on commercial ships.”

“When fitted on commercial ships the laser distraction system could utilise its own targeting capability or integrate with existing ship radar and sensor systems to control the direction and power of the beam. It could therefore work semi-autonomously and would also include security features to ensure it could not be used by pirates if they boarded the ship.

“Bryan Hore, BAE Systems business development manager and the lead for the anti-piracy programme, said: ‘Laser distraction is part of a wider programme of anti-piracy technologies being developed by BAE Systems, including radar systems, which utilises expertise and knowledge from the military domain. The aim of the laser distraction project is now to develop a non-lethal deterrent to pirates, which has no lasting effects, which can work in a maritime environment, be operated by the crew at no risk, and be cost effective.'”

——————————————————————————————————————-

We wouldn’t want to hurt any pirates–Maybe you can use it to make popcorn!

CG Video of the Year, 2010

The Coast Guard Compass announced their 2010 Video of the Year based on viewers “likes” on YouTube.

“Receiving 162 votes, Coast Guard Port Security Unit 307 wins first place for their video featuring the PSU members and the Haitian Coast Guard providing medical attention and medicine during an orphanage relief project after the magnitude 7.0 earthquake struck the Port-au-Prince.”

They go on to identify the second and third place videos as well.