“Coast Guard icebreaker departs for months-long Arctic deployment, circumnavigation of North America” –PACAREA

USCGC Healy (WAGB-20) U.S. Coast Guard photo by Lt. Kellen Browne.

Below is a Pacific Area news release quoted in full. While the press release makes this sound routine, the circumnavigation of North America, which will presumably include transit through the North West Passage, is very different from her normal routine.

It is a bit discouraging to see the statement, “The Polar Security Cutter is still in the design phase…”

united states coast guard 
U.S. Coast Guard Pacific Area News Release July 16, 2021

Coast Guard icebreaker departs for months-long Arctic deployment, circumnavigation of North America

SEATTLE — The Coast Guard Cutter Healy (WAGB 20) departed Seattle on Saturday, July 10, for a months-long Arctic deployment and circumnavigation of North America. 

The crew aboard Healy, a 420’ medium icebreaker, will provide U.S. surface presence in the Arctic, conduct high latitude science and research missions, engage in exercises and professional exchanges with foreign navies and patrols, and conduct other operations as directed throughout the deployment. 

Healy is scheduled to circumnavigate North America via the Northwest Passage and the Panama Canal.  Healy’s deployment supports the Coast Guard’s Arctic Strategy while providing critical training opportunities for Polar sailors and future operations in the Arctic. 

The crew will promote U.S. interests along the U.S. and Russia maritime boundary line. 

“Healy’s deployment provides opportunities to deepen the Coast Guard’s cooperation and commitment with our Arctic allies and partners and to support scientific exploration to increase understanding of the changing Arctic environment and associated impacts,” said Coast Guard Pacific Area Commander Vice Adm. Michael McAllister. 

The Healy deploys annually to the Arctic to support multiple science missions and Operation Arctic Shield, the service’s annual operation to execute U.S. Coast Guard missions, enhance maritime domain awareness, strengthen partnerships, and build preparedness, prevention, and response capabilities across the Arctic domain. 

Commissioned in 1999, Healy is one of two active Polar icebreakers in the Coast Guard’s fleet. The Seattle-based Coast Guard Cutter Polar Star (WAGB 10) is a heavy Polar icebreaker commissioned in 1976. 

The U.S. Coast Guard is recapitalizing its Polar icebreaker fleet to ensure continued access to the polar regions and to protect the country’s economic, commercial, environmental, and national security interests.  The Polar Security Cutter is still in the design phase, and Halter Marine is working toward completing the necessary work to begin construction on this incredibly complex, state-of-the-art icebreaker. The contract delivery date for the first Polar Security Cutter is 2024. 

4 thoughts on ““Coast Guard icebreaker departs for months-long Arctic deployment, circumnavigation of North America” –PACAREA

  1. This statement proves that the PSC was never going to be based on the Polarstern II parent craft. Even the German government cancelled the contract for Polarstern II. If it was a mature design, you wouldn’t need years of new design work to start building it. Just hoping this doesn’t turn into another Deepwater mess.

    • I’m fairly sure they used as much of the Polarstern II concept as they could. Considering the very different missions and operational requirements of the two designs, it was probably not much to begin with and likely more things like hull and propulsion design principles and experience rather than actually copy-pasting stuff from one drawing to another.

      • Agree, but wasn’t an original solicitation requirement that the ship be based on an existing parent craft design? I don’t think a ship that exists in vaporware and CG drawings would qualify as an existing design. It reminds me of the tiltrotor drone that Deepwater was supposed to deploy. Damn thing was a hollow model for photo ops.

        VT Halter has a checkered past building larger ships. Two complete failures of NOAA builds a while ago. They seem to be on the right track these days with new leadership. We can only hope they can pull it off.

      • I don’t remember if the parent design approach (which was definitely on the wish list at some point) ended up in the final requirements. The problem with that is the limited number of suitable built candidates that could be considered as the parent design for the PSC.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s