You may have heard about an incident where a 47 foot MLB was tracked by 12 to 30 objects that were thought to be Unmanned Air Systems.
The War Zone has a post that talks about this and other recent incidents, reports, and conspiracy theories that involve drone, “Coast Guard Ship Stalked by Unidentified Aircraft, Iran Drone Mothership Claim Shot Down by DoD.” More here and here.
Drones are hot sellers. There are a lot of them, and there will be many more after Christmas. With the reports of use of drones in the war between Ukraine and Russia, activities involving drones are starting to receive a lot of public attention, and it is not surprising that many see them as potentially dangerous or at least a threat to privacy. Drones flown at night have probably also resulted in a number of UFO sighting reports. Plus, a lot of drone operators are not aware or ignore FAA regulations that apply to them.
Opinions about the size and speed of drones seen at night are extremely unreliable, but there are ways to identify drones that are operating legally. I will try to provide some basic information and point toward the current regulations.
Why are they hard to track? Large drones are not hard to track if they are operated at altitude. On the other hand, small drones operated at low altitudes are very hard to pick up on radar. They are down in the clutter. Virtually all of these sightings are probably small drones of less than 55 pounds, the vast majority less than five pounds.
Air search radars frequently exploit doppler effect to pick moving targets out of the clutter, but most drones are slower than the speeds necessary to trigger a detection by doppler–they are close to the ground and move at speeds similar to that of millions of cars.
In addition to being small, most drones are made of non-radar reflective materials like foam and plastic. There is very little that would return a radar signal other than the motors and wires.
Why don’t the operators show up electronically? Most radios used to control drones now are frequency agile and relatively short range so they may be difficult to recognize. They have to be frequency agile because they use the same radio frequencies common in household electronics, so short bursts on a 2.4 GHZ frequency are indistinguishable from thousands of others. Also, drones may fly a preprogrammed route with no additional radio frequency required. Drones can also be programmed to follow a person or presumably any moving object.
Are they doing anything illegal? FAA Regulations Part 107 applies to both recreational and commercial use of small, civil, unmanned aircraft systems–small meaning 55 pounds (25 kg) or less. As the operator of remote-control model airplanes that are, like multi-rotors, considered drones, I am somewhat familiar with the issues.
Some things are specifically illegal without a specific waiver or exemption. Waivers may be relatively easy to obtain. I regularly get one where I fly.
- Flying a UAS beyond the line of sight of the person or team controlling the drone
- Flying more than 400 feet above ground level.
- A single pilot operating more than one aircraft simultaneously
- Flying at night or during twilight without required lighting.
- Operating in restricted air space. (Restricted areas may be temporary like over sporting events or effectively permanent like around airports and over Washington DC.)
Flying or hovering over your house at less than 400 feet is probably not illegal, but flying over people exposed on the ground may be. Harrasing people on the ground with a drone is definitely illegal.
How can they be detected and identified? Perhaps most relevant is the requirement to have a remote ID module if flown outside of a “Federally Recognized Identification Area (FRIA)” (typically a defined area around a remote-controlled model airfield registered and approved by the FAA).
So that solves the problem, right? No! The ID modules are short range, I have heard 2 miles or less. Operated low or where terrain blocks the signal, it is going to be less, so to even detect the signal you have to be relatively close. There are applications for smart phones that allow anyone to access the ID module signal, but generally law enforcement has received no training and in fact has no knowledge that these are available.
So, what should we do? We are in a transition period. Going from a time when drone sightings were rare, to a time when they will be routine. Amazon is planning on using drones to drop packages. Drones are useful. They are not going away. Seeing lights in the night sky that move irregularly and that you cannot identify is probably not a reason for concern. We really don’t want people shooting at lights in the sky.
Irresponsible drone operation may require enforcement. FAA’s stated enforcement strategy is first to try to educate before moving on to fines. There no specific acts identified as felonies under part 107 but negligent operation causing significant damage or violation of restricted airspace would certainly be covered by other laws including laws applied to operation of larger aircraft.
Perhaps Coast Guard units need to be trained in the use of drone ID applications.
Use of Force: As we know, drones can be used as weapons and as they become more common place, there is more likelihood the Coast Guard will need to take them down for force protection, defense readiness, and Ports, Waterways, and Coastal Security. The cutters of Patrol Forces Southwest Asia (PATFORSWA) have been fitted with short range, high resolution, drone detection radars and what appear to be electronic countermeasures, so are getting some experience with drone detection, passive countermeasures, and possibly hard kill countermeasures as well.
The Coast Guard’s missions may require use of force. In some cases, electronic warfare may be sufficient. Directed energy weapons seem to hold promise, but 30mm guns with air burst ammunition and APKWS 70mm guided rockets have proven capability and provide additional capability against other threats.

the DRS RADA Multi-Mission Hemispheric Radar can also be used to jam the guidance systems used on drones too…
That is if the drone is under remote control. If the target is fixed they can simply be programmed to go to the target point.
does the drone have Inertial Navigation System or is it guided by GPS, which can be Jammed…
@Secundius, depends on the drone. Most of the readily available ones use GPS but just saw that the V-bat can operate in GPS denied environments. Inertial navigation is likely to get progressively cheaper, but most commercially available drones don’t need the capability.
No they can’t.
Some interesting statistics. 16 Eye-Opening Drone Stats 📈 [2024 Update]
While it is entirely possible to explain why there is any one particular drone sighting, we are never going to have an explanation of all of them that will satisfy everyone. On the other hand, there is no evidence of an attack by foreign agents, a government conspiracy, or massive coordinated criminal intent.
The simplest explanation is that a lot of individuals are out flying their privately owned UAS. Some have the required short range identification system, and some do not. Recent regulator changes have allowed operation of drones at night without a waiver.
107.29 Operation at night.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, no person may operate a small unmanned aircraft system at night unless—
(1) The remote pilot in command of the small unmanned aircraft has completed an initial knowledge test or training, as applicable, under § 107.65 after April 6, 2021; and
(2) The small unmanned aircraft has lighted anti-collision lighting visible for at least 3 statute miles that has a flash rate sufficient to avoid a collision. The remote pilot in command may reduce the intensity of, but may not extinguish, the anti-collision lighting if he or she determines that, because of operating conditions, it would be in the interest of safety to do so.
My take on the mass hysteria event, centered in New Jersey right now, is that these are mostly (95%+) misidentified aircraft and hobbyist drones. Most of the sightings are at night of objects with blinking lights and no sound. Altitude and distance is very hard to estimate during the day, but add darkness, and particularly if the objects are out of sound detection, it becomes impossible to describe size, shape, distance, etc.
Now, that said, there have been several very large drone operations in US airspace, over military facilities, mostly by China. We shouldn’t lose sight of a real threat, because of the current mass hysteria.
Chinese national here on student visa caught flying drone over Newport News drydock where new Ford-class carriers are under construction: https://youtu.be/nWq5ymqS0OA?si=6LYwWDXbIr-APRHO
Drones operated over Langley AFB and Norfolk Naval base for 17 days with impunity: https://youtu.be/lDozOcakUic?si=YRgFqVwtzYmjBf1r
Chinese national caught flying drone over Vandenberg AFB: https://youtu.be/LHeisy74l8I?si=h92TWuWGf4bpWRIN
He was sentenced to 6 months for espionage.
This threat came onto my radar three years ago, before Ukraine highlighted the kinetic threat, when I saw this report: https://youtu.be/ZbTVpmegaDQ?si=ZtAjzco9cI7LhBc6
Long before the FAA came up with part 107 an idiot was operating a quadcopter style drone just off the end of the runway of our local airport. This was already illegal then.
There were also incidents as drones operating over wildfires as CALFIRE was using water bombers required shut down of the water bombing activities.
Part 107 is intended to allow rapid identification of registered drone operators who are operating where they should not be.
Most of these problems are the result of poor judgement. To be a registered drone pilot, you have to complete a short course and test. Very easy for the easy for recreational drone pilots, a bit more difficult for commercial drone operators.
Mostly it is a guide to avoid being stupid, e. g. what not to do.
This hysteria is just a distraction from investigating the real problems that inevitably arise.