New from CG-9

The Acquisitions Directorate (CG-9) website has been busy lately.

They are reporting the award of a  contract for the first 38 of what may ultimately be 500 “Response Boat, Small,” and award of a contract for eleven more “Response Boat, Medium.”

They also report on work on the helicopter haul down and traversing system to be used on NSC with the H-65.

They have also issued their new newsletter. This month it discusses CG infrastructure improvements, and Master Chief Ayer answers, “I don’t understand why the new Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC) has to be so big. If it is replacing the Medium Endurance Cutter (WMEC), why is it as big as a High Endurance Cutter (WHEC)?”: Read the newsletter (pdf)>>

(Think I’ll ask MCPO Ayers why we aren’t using the Navy’s helicopter haul down and traversing system.)

China Goes to the Poles

China Defense Blog has a photo essay from China’s recent expedition to the Arctic, as well as pictures of their station in Antartica. Below is a photo of their large Russian built icebreaker from the post, with the Wiki link for the specs. Note in the link above, their helo looks an awful lot like an H-65. There is also some photos of their new support aircraft, a modified DC-3.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-08/21/c_13455724.htm
ABOARD XUELONG, Aug. 21 (Xinhua) — A group of Chinese scientists reached the North Pole on Friday afternoon, extending their research on the Arctic Ocean to Earth’s northernmost point.

Fourteen Chinese scientists were flown in by helicopter from icebreaker the Xuelong, or Snow Dragon, which carried a Chinese exploration team and reached a point at 88.22 degrees north latitude and 177.20 degrees west longitude.

https://chuckhillscgblog.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/1282481690_28471.jpg?w=300

Photo: MV Xue Long

Operation Sail 2012

https://i0.wp.com/eastbaycouples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/CoastGuardCutterEagle.jpg

Looks like Operation Sail 2012 is shaping up nicely. Here is an announcement of the first seven tall ships committed to participate (Eagle leads the list of course) and projected schedule.

“Fuentes (chairman of Operation Sail, Inc.) said that tall ships from Russia, Spain, Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, Mexico and the United States are the first confirmed participants in the multi-port commemoration which begins in April 2012.  Cities involved include New Orleans, San Juan, New York, Norfolk, Baltimore, Boston and New London.

“OpSail is partnering with the U.S. Navy to produce events next year that celebrate the bicentennial of the writing of The Star-Spangled Banner and commemorate the War of 1812.”

Iranian Warships off the US Coast?

File:Iranian Alvand class frigat.JPEGThe Iranians have announced that they intend to send a naval task force to provide a “powerful” presence off the US coast. Iranian military pronouncements frequently seem to be meaningless chest pounding for domestic consumption, and in all probability the task force will consist of only one warship smaller than a 270, and a replenishment vessel, but there may be more to this than simple theatrics. Informationdissemination suggests that this may be a way of cirumventing the UN sanctions on Iran and that perhaps this is a way to allow technology transfer. Likely port calls are Cuba and Venezuela.

At the risk of appearing paranoid, I’ll try to think like the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp commander in charge of these vessels. I want to embarrass, degrade, and covertly attack the Great Satan in any way I can, as long as I don’t get caught. I might also have a opportunity to make a personal fortune. Might this be an opportunity to pass weapons, like shoulder launched SAMs, to terrorists already in the US by making rendezvous off shore, or to simply put agents ashore. It might be an opportunity make a substantial profit by delivering weapons to a drug cartel, maybe even a small submarine. There is of course the opportunity for technology transfers in both direction when port calls are made.

In November 2010 a German newspaper carried a story that the leaders of Iran and Venezuela had reached an agreement to establish a ballistic missile base in Venezuela armed with Iranian built IRBMs capable of reaching the US. This has been discounted by the State Department, but the logic of such an arrangement would have to be attractive to leaders of both Iran and Venezuela as a way of insuring against a US strike against either regime.

Should someone assign a shadow to these vessels while they are off the US coasts?

As informationdissemination notes, the Chinese are also expected in Caribbean Waters in the form of a hospital ship. If other, potentially hostile, navies start acting like the US Navy, keeping warships off our coasts, as they may in the not too distant future, how might the Coast Guard be different?

“20,000 Heat-Seeking Missiles” May be Missing

First, we had a report from The Telegraph that the Iranians had taken advantage of the chaos in Libya to steal dozens of sophisticated SA-24 Russian made shoulder launched surface-to-air missiles similar to “Stingers.”

Now Fox News reports there may be as many as 20,000 of these weapons on the loose.

While this high number sounds unlikely, it does look like the supply and demand curves for shoulder launched SAMs is now working in favor of the bad guys.

Retraction: NSC to be named for Munro

Relative to my earlier post, I have just been informed by a highly placed and very reliable source that there will be a National Security Cutter named for Douglas Munro.

The planned names for the remaining cutters, approved by the Commandant in February, will be:

#5 James, #6 Kimball, #7 Munro, #8 Midgett

The Name that is no longer on the list is “Stone.”

SM1 Douglas Munro, Anniversary. Will there be a USCGC Munro?

Today marks the 69th anniversary of the death of Douglas Munro. The Coast Guard historian’s page is here. There is some background on the unit he was serving with here.

Apparently there will not be a “Legends Class” National Security Cutter named for Munro. This is the current plan: WMSL 750 Bertholf
, WMSL 751 Waesche, 
WMSL 752 Stratton, 
WMSL 753 Hamilton
, WMSL 754 James, 
WMSL 755 Stone, 
WMSL 756 Midgett, 
WMSL 757 Kimball.

When WHEC-724 is decommissioned, we will presumably no longer have a cutter named for the only Coast Guard Medal of Honor recipient.

Perhaps naming the first Offshore Patrol Cutter for Munro, and giving his name to the class, would be appropriate.

 

Sept. 26, 1918, Cutter Tampa, Lost with all Hands

File:USCGC Tampa (ex Miami).jpg

http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-us-cs/uscg-sh/cgsh-t/tampa.htm

This is the 93rd anniversary of the loss of Cutter Tampa, which was the greatest loss of American naval forces at sea due to enemy action in WWI.

Naval History and Heritage Command is commemorating the loss.

Additional information on the ship here.

In addition to the Coast Guard Memorial at Arlington, the crew is remembered in England with their names engraved on the walls of the chapel of the Brookwood American Cemetery and memorial in Britain.

Piracy Update, 25 September, 2011

Somalia and Vicinity:

There has been another Yacht hijacking with deadly results. One of the two on-board was killed. The other was rescued by a Spanish warship (LPD). The two on board the yacht were believed to have been French.

In a not untypical action, a French Navy frigate recognized a dhow as a vessel previously seized by pirates and now being used as a mother ship, but ultimately let them go after they abandoned their “attack skiff.”

The Russians seem to use different tactics and are having some success against the pirates, while Somali pirates seem to be working further North into the Red Sea.

The Second Front–Piracy in the Gulf of Guinea:

There has been a significant upswing in pirate activity on Africa’s Atlantic Coast. An oil tanker, with a crew of 23, was seized on 14 September, but has already been released, as is reported here. The earlier report of its capture also provided some evidence the African Partnership Station and efforts to beef up local “coast guards” is paying dividends. The pirates in this area seem to be more interested in stealing oil, than collecting ransom.

Private Security Guards:

The idea of using private security guards continues to gain traction. The observation that no ship with armed guards aboard would seem to make this an obvious choice–“Marine Insurers Support Armed Guards to Counter Pirates.”

The concept is still not without its difficulties even so. The international transportation of weapons is still problematic. This is a little different from the norm, but a group of anti-piracy contractors have had a minor run-in with officials in Mozambique. (This apparently has a remote USCG connection because one of the private contractors was reportedly a civilian instructor for the Coast Guard.)

Representatives of the shipping industry have called for a United Nations armed guard force.

Cost of Piracy:

Neptune Maritime Security discusses the human cost of piracy that results from irresponsible ship owners and vessels that don’t meet international standards. (Thanks to eaglespeak for finding this.)

Here is a bit of background on the cargo owners liabilities incurred because of the potential for piracy.

Tactical Innovation?:

Not sure this is a tactical innovation on the part of the pirates, an act of frustration, or perhaps even an accident, but when the crew of a ship sought refuge in their “citadel” pirates set fire to the ship. The pirates fled and an Italian warship quickly arrived on scene to rescue the crew who abandoned ship.