“Coast Guard cutter returns to Florida after escorting recently seized motor tanker” –SE District

U.S. Coast Guard crewmembers transfer from the Coast Guard Cutter Vigilant (WMEC 617) to a motor tanker by a helicopter crew assigned to U.S. Navy Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 9 in the Atlantic Ocean, Jan. 7, 2026. Vigilant escorted the tanker, which was seized by a joint Coast Guard and Department of War team for conducting illicit activities in the Caribbean Sea. (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 2nd Class Brandon Feehery)

Below is a press release from the Southeast District. This is a 61 year old ship, still doing the job.

Anyone know what this device, pictured below, cropped from photo above, is?

U.S. Coast Guard cutter USCGC Vigilant (WMEC-617). 2 March 2008. Photo by Workman via Wikipedia.

U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Vigilant (WMEC 617), right, sails in the Western Atlantic Ocean while escorting a motor tanker after a right of visit boarding, Jan. 7, 2026. Vigilant escorted the motor tanker, which was seized by a Coast Guard tactical boarding team with support from the Department of War, for operating as a vessel without nationality in the Caribbean Sea. (U.S. Navy Photo)


Jan. 20, 2026

Coast Guard cutter returns to Florida after escorting recently seized motor tanker

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — The U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Vigilant (WMEC 617) returned to Cape Canaveral on Friday after a 33-day patrol in the Caribbean Sea supporting operations Pacific Viper and Southern Spear.

During the patrol, Vigilant escorted a motor tanker, which was seized by a U.S. Coast Guard tactical boarding team with support from the Department of War, for operating as a vessel without nationality in the Caribbean Sea. Vigilant’s crew coordinated with naval and law enforcement partners to transfer personnel and provisions to the tanker. A law enforcement team from Vigilant boarded the vessel to provide security during the 600-nautical-mile transit to the United States.

Cmdr. Steve Welch, commanding officer of Vigilant, said, “I am proud of the crew’s adaptability and professionalism during this mission of national importance. Their performance ensured the safe execution of the operation in partnership with the Department of War.”

Unique statutory authorities enable the Coast Guard to enforce international and domestic law in the maritime domain, deploying assets to conduct missions in U.S. waters and on the high seas. The Coast Guard’s involvement in this seizure was conducted under Title 14, U.S. Code and in accordance with customary international law. The Coast Guard exercises these authorities to protect maritime safety, security, and U.S. interests.

“Coast Guard Cutter Alert returns home after interdicting more than $18.4M in narcotics during 45-day patrol” –Southeast District

Costa Rican Coast Guard and U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Alert (WMEC 630) crew members pose for a photo aboard the cutter in Golfito, Costa Rica, Jan. 2, 2026. Alert’s crew hosted the Costa Rican personnel for a tour of the cutter and embarked MH-65 Dolphin helicopter as well as discussions of ways to strengthen the presence of international counter-drug efforts in the region. (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Ensign Ethan Lasher)

Below is a news release. It is pretty routine but I wanted to point out a couple of things.

This more than 56 year old ship is still doing useful work.

The US Coast Guard has been helping the Costa Rican Coast Guard since the 1980s.


Jan. 15, 2026

Coast Guard Cutter Alert returns home after interdicting more than $18.4M in narcotics during 45-day patrol

Cape Canaveral, Fla. — The crew of the Coast Guard Cutter Alert (WMEC 630) returned to their home port in Cape Canaveral, Thursday, following a 45-day counter-drug patrol in the Windward Passage, Caribbean Sea and Eastern Pacific Ocean.

While underway in the Coast Guard Southeast District area of responsibility, Alert’s crew interdicted a go-fast style vessel trafficking illegal narcotics in the Windward Passage. The crew seized 2,250 pounds of cocaine valued at $18.4 million, seven pounds of marijuana valued at $7,000 and an illegal firearm. The four suspected smugglers on board, narcotics and firearm were transferred to the Bahamas government for prosecution.

“I am immensely proud of my crew’s unwavering dedication,” said Cmdr. Mario Gil, commanding officer of Alert. “Time spent away from family and missed holidays represents a significant sacrifice, which makes their commitment to combating narco-terrorism and protecting our nation’s borders from illicit drugs all the more commendable, as demonstrated by the extraordinary success of this patrol.”

In the region, Alert’s crew also patrolled in support of Operation Vigilant Sentry while underway in the Coast Guard Southeast District area of responsibility. Crew member presence in the vicinity of Haiti served to deter unsafe and illegal migration.

While transiting the Panama Canal, the crew had the distinct honor of hosting Ambassador Kevin Marino Cabrera, U.S. Ambassador to Panama, aboard the cutter for a tour of the ship, discussions about current operations and a Miami-inspired lunch prepared by Alert’s culinary specialists.

The crew also supported U.S. – Panama relations by hosting eight members from Panama’s National Aeronaval Service (SENAN) and Joint Maritime Force – Panama for joint training and a professional exchange of counter-narcotics best practices. Crew members conducted multiple joint pursuit-style, simulated interdictions with vessels and forces from SENAN. This training provided continued support of the Salas-Becker Complementary Agreement of 2002, which created a framework for U.S.–Panama bilateral cooperation to counter illicit drug trafficking by sea and air.

During a port-of-call visit to Golfito, Costa Rica, Alert’s crew welcomed representatives from the Costa Rican Coast Guard aboard for a tour of the ship and an embarked MH-65 Dolphin helicopter from the Coast Guard Helicopter Interdiction Tactical Squadron, based in Jacksonville. The visit fostered joint nation inoperability and strengthened international counter-drug efforts in the region.

While at sea in the Coast Guard Southwest District area of responsibility, the crew conducted boardings to verify and enforce international law at sea in the Eastern Pacific Ocean.

In addition, Alert crew members earned the title of shellback after crossing the equator, a title few sailors earn during a career.

“Successful JAGM Quad Launcher Demo Showcases 90-Degree Vertical Launch And C-UAS Capabilities” –Lockheed Martin

An earlier launch using the JASM Quad Launcher (JQL)

Below is a Lockheed Martin news release. Hellfire, JAGM, and the longer ranged JAGM MR can be fired from this launcher. The launcher has been in the works since 2020.

Lockheed prepare for the first JAGM test fire from a JQL launcher in October 2025. Credit: Lockheed Martin.

Even only one quad launcher would be a huge upgrade in the capabilities of Webber class WPCs. It appears Lockheed has decided they will market the launchers in trainable mounts that allow the canisters to be reloaded with little or no special equipment, either as single quad launchers or as multiple quad launchers mounted together. Our larger cutters might also benefit from adding this capability.

A close-up of the Hellfire/JAGM launchers on the Arleigh Burke model on display at the 2025 Surface Navy Association symposium. Joseph Trevithick


CHINA LAKE, Calif., Jan. 15, 2026 – For the first time, Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) conducted a successful 90-degree launch of a Joint-Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) from the JAGM Quad Launcher (JQL) during a demonstration in China Lake, California.

THE BIG PICTURE

  • In the demonstration, JAGM proved its ability to neutralize UAS threat systems.
  • It also demonstrated the versatility of the JQL launcher, which was mounted to a Richard Childress Racing 6×6 Mothership vehicle.

WHY IT MATTERS

  • Validating JAGM & JQL full vertical-launch capability: This demonstration validated JAGM’s full vertical‑launch capability across multiple platforms, including surface‑combatant vessels, which provides a 360‑degree defensive envelope for maritime vessels and other platforms. With JAGM’s advanced dual-mode seeker (SAL/MMW), this integration effort presents JAGM as the ideal munition solution for the U.S. Navy and its allies’ mission-critical needs.
  • Showcasing counter-UAS technology: The successful engagement of a UAS threat with JAGM underscores the missile’s ability to detect, track and neutralize hostile threats including drones, unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) and other air threats. This is an increasingly vital capability that modern naval forces need to address emerging threats.
  • Multidomain mission integration: The integration of JAGM with the JQL highlights Lockheed Martin’s ability to provide flexible, mission‑tailored deployment across air, sea and land environments. Operators can select from a range of engagement envelopes to meet specific user mission objectives.

EXPERT PERSPECTIVES

  • “The successful JQL verticallaunch demonstration confirms that JAGM can be rapidly deployed from a multimissile launcher across a variety of scenarios, while delivering the networkcentric integration our global users demand,” said Casey Walsh, program management director, Lockheed Martin Multi-Domain Missile Systems. “This milestone validates our vision of a unified missile architecture that seamlessly operates across air, land and sea domains, enhancing survivability and flexibility for future combat operations.”
  • “Lockheed Martin continues to push the boundaries of what is possible in vertical launch system development, driving innovation and advancement in the field,” said Edward Dobeck, director, Lockheed Martin Launching Systems. “This proven combat-ready capability meets multidomain deployment objectives today, and provides the same reliability expected of all our launching systems.”

For additional information, visit our website: www.lockheedmartin.com.

About Lockheed Martin

Lockheed Martin is a global defense technology company driving innovation and advancing scientific discovery. Our all-domain mission solutions and 21st Century Security® vision accelerate the delivery of transformative technologies to ensure those we serve always stay ahead of ready. More information at Lockheedmartin.com.

“Coast Guard awards contract to rebuild Station South Padre Island” –CG-9

Below is a post from the Acquisitions Directorate (CG-9).

The location near the Mexican border is obviously significant, but it is also near Starbase, TX.

“Starbase, Texas, is a burgeoning city and SpaceX hub in the Rio Grande Valley near Brownsville, established around SpaceX’s Starship development and launch facilities, becoming an official municipality in May 2025 with hundreds of residents, mostly SpaceX employees, creating a unique space-focused company town known as the ‘Gateway to Mars'” —AI overview.

I presume South Padre Station also supports Operation River Wall. 


Coast Guard awards contract to rebuild Station South Padre Island

The Coast Guard’s Facilities Design and Construction Center awarded a $200 million design-build contract to The Haskell Company Jan. 9 for the comprehensive recapitalization and expansion of Coast Guard Station South Padre Island in South Padre Island, Texas. The award was made as a task order through the National Multi-Award Construction Contract III and is the largest single task order in the history of the Coast Guard’s Military Construction program.

The task order, made possible through the historic investment in Coast Guard shore infrastructure as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, will deliver the design and construction of more than 120,000 square feet of essential facilities and supporting infrastructure, directly enhancing mission readiness and execution for Coast Guard personnel in the region. Preliminary design and environmental work will begin immediately, with project completion anticipated in summer 2028.

The full scope of work under the task order includes:

  • Completion of an environmental assessment, site survey investigations and design services for various facilities.
  • Construction of new station facilities.
  • Construction of unaccompanied personnel housing, additional berthing and mission support facilities.
  • Rebuilding of waterfront infrastructure.
  • Construction of a Joint Operations Center and Customs and Border Protection support space.
  • Forward operations space for Deployable Specialized Forces.
  • Delivery of a new harbor operations center and other mission support facilities.
  • Comprehensive site development, utilities and outfitting.

Station South Padre Island is strategically positioned to support border security, interdict illicit trafficking and ensure the safe and lawful movement of commerce. The rebuild effort will address damages at the boathouse that were caused by a fire in April 2025 and enhance mission capabilities to fully support Coast Guard core missions of securing the U.S. border and maritime approaches, facilitating commerce vital to economic prosperity and strategic mobility and responding to contingencies along the Gulf Coast and surrounding waterways.

The project represents the largest award value for a shore infrastructure construction project in Coast Guard history and will be delivered on the shortest timeline to date. The planning phase was compressed from the standard 18 months to 45 days, while the contracting process was reduced from 15 months to four months.

For more information: Shore Programs

Is Coast Guard PR Digitally Challenged?

In most respects Coast Guard Public Relations does a great job. I see it doing much better than the Navy and DOD in general.

But too frequently when I try to go to a Coast Guard PR site I get this.

Today it was Coast Guard News by Region, United States Coast Guard News, and Acquisitions Directorate (CG-9). Then I try again a little later and they all work.

I do recognize we are using a DOD server. Sometimes I see the same “Safari can’t find the server” when I try to go to DOD sites too. Today none of the DOD sites from my Recommended Blogs List were down.

What’s going on? I’ve asked this question before, but still haven’t seen an explanation.

The NSCs are WFFs or Maybe WPFs or Maybe WPL but not WMSL

The FF(X) based on the design of the Bertholf class national security cutters.

Force Design 2028 declares they want “To transform the Coast Guard into a more agile, capable, and responsive 21st-century fighting force.”

If you want to be useful as a fighting force, it helps if you speak the same language. To a Coast Guardsman, WMSL may mean Coast Guard Maritime Security Cutter, Large, but to the Navy, the “M” immediately identifies a mine warfare ship. The “L” would probably interpret as “large.” WMSM may imply medium, but they are virtually the same size as the WMSLs.

This is a pet peeve of mine. I have written about it several times, but not recently, and maybe the new administration will see my point if someone presents the case to them.

There is another reason the Coast Guard might want to consider a change of designation, aside from the fact that the current designations don’t fit either the Navy or NATO’s systems, that is the adaptation of the Bertholf class as the FF(X). If it is a frigate, then the Bertholfs are Coast Guard frigates, WFF.

I suspect the Coast Guard budget would benefit if its wartime military role were more widely recognized.

I would admit they aren’t everyone’s idea of a frigate, so perhaps WPF. I like that designation because the PF designation has a Coast Guard history. 75 ships of the Tacoma class were designated PF or Patrol Frigate and were manned by Coast Guard crews during World War II, and some were transferred to the Coast Guard post war and carried a WPF designation. (We also had some destroyer escorts designated WDE.)

Tacoma class patrol frigate USS Hutchinson (PF-45) Underway, probably circa February 1946, after being converted for weather reporting service. Courtesy of William H. Davis, 1976. U.S. Navy photo NH 84721

There is not really much difference between the capabilities of the Bertholf class and the Argus class ships, so we could use the same designation for them, but if we must differentiate, how about WPL for the Heritage class.

Looking back, prior to the 1965, our large patrol cutters were all designated WPG, Coast Guard Patrol Gunboats, so WPF or WPL would not be a radical change, more a return to the old system, still in effect in the US Navy.

USCGC Duane (WPG-33) in Godthaab Fjord, Greenland in the Spring of 1941. Her mission was to survey the east coast of Greenland in order to identify sites for airfields. Note the SOC-4 seaplane amidships. Photo courtesy of A. D. Baker III from “U.S. Coast Guard Cutters and Craft of World War II” by Robert L. Scheina.

USCGC Wachusett (WPG/WHEC 44) No caption; 28 January 1966; Photo No. 040166-04; photographer unknown.

USCGC Modoc (WPG-46) USCG photo.

USCG Cutter Ingham WPG 35

USCGC Mohawk (WPG-78) during WWII

USCGC Spencer (WPG-36) in 1942 or 1943. 8 March 1943 German U-boat U-633 was sunk in the North Atlantic south-west of Iceland, in position 58.21N, 31.00W, by depth charges from the US Coast Guard cutter USCGC Spencer. Spencer sank U-175 with assistance of USCGC Duane, on April 17, 1943.

“Coast Guard pilot program to issue mobile devices to every active-duty member” –MyCG

Below is a story from MyCG, I think this is pretty exciting. It should be a great moral booster. Being able to stay in contact with family will be huge. I can see major improvements in rate training. Individuals should be able to access a catalog of training videos.

There is probably a down side to this in terms of operational security, but that can probably be minimized.

Thoughts?


Jan. 13, 2026

Coast Guard pilot program to issue mobile devices to every active-duty member

By By Zach Shapiro, MyCG Writer

A U.S. Coast Guard member aboard a Response Boat-Small (RB-S) tests an iPad distributed as part of the Digital Seabag Pilot (U.S. Coast Guard photo courtesy of Lindsay Abbott).

A Coast Guard Force Design 2028 Initiative will put a digital device (tablet, phone, and/or laptop) in the hands of every active duty member in the next two years. More than just a physical device, the Digital Seabag is an entire ecosystem that pairs cutting-edge hardware – like tablets, phones, and laptops – with the applications, software, tools, and connectivity necessary to make them effective.

Digital Seabag, as the effort is known, is real and it’s moving fast. The service will give the workforce cutting-edge technology to save members time and help them do their jobs more effectively. The Coast Guard aims to eventually allow members to take these digital devices from unit to unit, ensuring smoother transitions during their careers in service.

All the while, the Coast Guard is moving fast on other initiatives to improve internet connectivity for the fleet. As we speak, experts are testing Secure Wireless Access Network (SWAN) 5G internet technology aboard Coast Guard Cutter Hamilton (WMSL-753). SWAN will allow cutter crew members to connect to the internet from anywhere on board, both in port and underway.

In the meantime, RADM Jon Hickey, the Assistant Commandant and Program Executive Officer for C5I and Chief Information Officer, explained, “Digital Seabag is all about rapidly delivering technology to positively impact our members in the field. Equipping our members with mobile devices and enhanced connectivity will enable them to do their jobs more efficiently and effectively. Moreover, we will be able to continuously deliver capability upgrades with speed and scale by pushing them to their devices as they become available. We’re just getting started!”

The future of the Coast Guard, according to the Force Design 2028 blueprint laid out to reshape the service, hinges on members having the tech they need, when they need it. To better understand those needs, the Digital Seabag team surveyed the entire Coast Guard workforce in August and received a staggering 5,400 responses from active-duty members, reservists, and civilians alike. Across these communities, the response was clear: people want digital devices that work in the varied environments in which they operate, and they need the Coast Guard to address internet speed and access issues that plague current technologies.

The field asked, and Headquarters listened. In the last few weeks, the Digital Seabag team launched the first phase of the Digital Seabag Pilot Program for Coast Guard Boat Forces. The team issued the first wave of digital devices to five units: Station South Padre Island, Station San Diego, Station Annapolis, Aids-to-Navigation (ANT) Long Island Sound, and the Boat Forces Operational Assessment & Readiness Support (OARS). Each unit will have the devices for a two-month pilot period. During this time, a joint team from the CG-C5I Digital Workplace and Telephony Program, the C5I Service Center, and the Experience Design and Integration Team (XPD) is conducting focus groups to collect actionable insights from the field that will create standard profiles to address the needs of the community, build resiliency and provide additional support. This will set the new standard for digital excellence in the Coast Guard.

A recent focus group with members of ANT Long Island Sound showed just how helpful this technology will be for the field. A focus group participant told moderators that “[…] sometimes, it would take up to an hour to log into a computer,” adding that “a lot of things that we do on those computers now can be done on an iPad.”

In the meantime, the Digital Seabag team will monitor key metrics to see how the devices improve members’ ability to execute their missions – and how the Coast Guard can improve them.

The iPhones and iPads were provided at no cost to the units. Members are getting two devices to test, and the Digital Seabag team will then use feedback from across the pilot program and the field to determine which devices will be issued across the Service.

This year, Digital Seabag will begin the next phase of the pilot: identifying, developing, and eventually releasing advanced applications on the newly issued devices to these five units. Additionally, the team will partner with ongoing efforts to address connectivity challenges, helping to deliver solutions to remote units so they can effectively use their new equipment. Eventually, Digital Seabag will be rolled out at scale throughout different deployed Coast Guard communities.

Boat Forces leadership is eager to see what the future holds. “I think [Digital Seabag] is a tremendous value add,” said Boatswain’s Mate (BM) Rating Force Master Chief (RFMC) Jonathan Harrington. Digital Seabag will allow members across all ratings in the Coast Guard to “have their credentials at their fingertips without having a full laptop.” That, in turn, will improve day-to-day experience and operations.

Harrington is especially excited to hear and incorporate operators’ feedback into future efforts. “These units are going to have a lasting impact,” he said. “This is something that’s going to impact all ratings [in the Service].”

Stay tuned for more updates on Digital Seabag and other technology initiatives at the Coast Guard.

“Top Ten Navies by Aggregate Displacement, 1 January 2026” –Phoenix_jz

Top Ten Navies by Aggregate Displacement, 1 January 2026

(You will need to click on the chart to make it large enough to be readable)

I have been looking forward to this. Once again has published his “Top Ten Navies by Aggregate Displacement.” I have duplicated his chart above and his comments below. Even so, it is worth while going to the original post for the very insightful comments.

Observations:

The US Navy is still far larger than the Chinese Navy despite having fewer units, larger in fact than the Chinese and Russian navies combined, and larger in every category other than submarines where the Russian Navy holds a slight edge over the USN. Even so, reportedly, the USN has more nuclear powered submarines than Russia and China combined.

Looking at the changes in displacement between 2022 and 2026, I was surprised to see that the absolute change in displacement of the US Navy was actually greater than the change in displacement of the Chinese Navy, 386,574 tons to 372,122 for China. We can’t take too much comfort in that, the Chinese are likely to enjoy local superiority in any likely conflict, but it does mean in a prolonged conflict, we have a great deal of bench strength.

If there is a surprise here, it is the Indian Navy, having grown 20.5% in four years. The basis of Naval power is of course the economy. If naval power is important to a nation, its naval power should rank at as high as its rank in Gross Domestic Product. We see this in that the two largest economies have the two largest navies. Thing is, there are two common measures of GDP, nominal and purchasing power parity (PPP). Nominal reflects how much you spend while PPP reflects how much you can buy. Russia is the poster child to illustrate the difference. Russia is ninth in nominal GDP just ahead of Canada and slightly behind Italy, but they are fourth in PPP. For India it its a little closer. India is fifth in nominal GDP behind Germany and Japan, but slightly ahead of the UK, but in PPP, they are #3, behind only China and the US, but with a GDP more than twice that of #4, Russia, 17.71 to 7.14 TUS$.

The Indian Navy is already a member of an exclusive club, nations that operate both aircraft carriers and nuclear powered ballistic missile submarines (although their SSBNs don’t seem to be as advanced as the first generation US Polaris missile subs). India has recently begun making an effort to increase shipbuilding and they are likely to follow in the foot steps of Japan, S, Korea, and China. It is going to take some time, but don’t be surprised to see India surpass the UK, Japan, and finally Russia in aggregate tonnage.

You would think the Europeans (UK, France, and Italy) would be doing a little better. Notably missing from the top ten is Germany, the leading economy in Europe.

I’ll add this note from last year because it still applies,

Coast Guards are not included in this analysis. This leads to some distortion since navy operated Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs) and patrol craft are counted as combatants, but coast guard operated OPVs and patrol craft are not counted at all. The US, China, Russia, Japan, India and South Korea all have substantial sea-going coast guards, notably the UK and France do not. The Indian Navy in particular has a large number of Navy operated OPVs and patrol craft.

Addendum:  In the comments of the original post, the author provided the following list of the next ten navies.

11: Turkey – 335,032t
12: Taiwan – 271,286t
13: Spain – 241,133t
14: Egypt – 229,650t
15: Germany – 228,472t
16: Australia – 218,224t
17: Greece – 182,303t
18: Chile – 171,592t
19: Brazil – 156,048t
20: Canada – 134,297t


Hello all!

The fourth edition of my top ten navy list arrives with 2026! For those unfamiliar, here are links to 20222023, 2024, and 2025 with a general explainer for the whole concept in that first 2022 edition.

The long and short of it is that this graph reflects a personal tracker I keep of almost every large and moderately sized navy, and calculates the aggregate displacement of these navies. It’s not a perfect way to display the size of navies – far from it in fact – but it is at least more representative than counting numbers of hulls alone, in my opinion.

To break down what each of these categories mean;

  • Surface Warships is an aggregate of all above-water warships and major aviation and amphibious assault platforms. This category includes CVNs, CVs, CVLs, LHDs, LHAs, LPDs, CGs, DDGs, FFGs, corvettes, OPVs, CPVs, lighter patrol craft, and MCM vessels.
  • Submarines is what it says on the tin – SSBNs, SSGNs, SSNs, SSKs, and for select nations where applicable (and where information is available), special purpose submarines. Please note dedicated training submarines are counted separately.
  • AORs includes all major fleet replenishment vessels (coastal vessels do not count, however).
  • Other Auxiliaries is a very wide net that essentially captures everything else. Special mission ships, support vessels, minor amphibious assault vessels (LSDs, LSTs, LCAC’s, LCM’s, LCU’s), training vessels, tugs, coastal support vessels, hydrography ships – all essential parts of navies, but generally often paid less attention to as they’re not as flashy as the warships proper.

Interesting trends in data that I thought I would share for various navies, and thoughts and observations otherwise;

The USN maintains its commanding position – though the increase in displacement seen here (+124,303t, or +1.7%) is deceptive, as this is primarily thanks to high-displacement auxiliaries and AORs that were delivered in 2024 – primarily two John Lewis-class AORs that for lack of crew did not become truly operational until 2025. Additionally, through my own error I missed that the fourth Expeditionary Mobile Base, USS John L. Canley, had been not just delivered but also commission in 2024, and that also counts significantly towards the upwards correction this year. Without the latter, the uptick would have only been about 17,639t.

Combatant forces fared poorly this year – 2025 was the first year since 2015 that the USN did not commission a single guided missile destroyer. A single surface combatant – the final Independence-class LCS – was commissioned this year, along with the twenty-fourth Virgina-class SSN. Decommissioned this year were two Ticonderoga-class CGs, a Los Angeles-class SSN, and four Avenger-class MCMV’s. Despite this, the year is less abysmal than it appears, as the USN did actually accept delivery of two DDGs, two SSNs, and two LCS – but most of these will only commission in 2026. For at least one ship (the final Freedom-class LCS), this delay was solely due to the government shutdown late in 2025. Still, the long-term view of U.S. shipbuilding is less than positive, given LCS production has ended and the successor frigate program has been cut down. The new frigate program (FFX) apparently will be no better armed than the LCS. Likewise, the future DDG design (DDG(X)) appears likely to be delayed by the diversion towards the new ‘BBG(X)’ program unveiled this past December.

The PLAN recorded a year of strong growth (+198,473t, or +6.7%), well above average and predictably breaking three million tonnes. In 2025 the PLAN commissioned its third aircraft carrier, Fujian, along with a fourth Type 075 LHD, seven Type 052DL-class destroyers, four Type 054AG-class frigates, and the remaining Type 054B-class frigate (both may have actually commissioned this year, though only one counted towards their tonnage growth as I included the first ship in last year’s count). No tonnage increases were recorded for submarines this year – I do not yet positively assess that any of the Type 093B have yet entered service, and Type 039C production remains something of a mystery. I no longer have any confidence in being able to render even a ±2 boat margin of error on the number in service.

PLAN shipbuilding continues to move ahead at pace. A hull that may be the Type 004 – China’s first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier – is currently under assembly at Dalian. The amphibious assault ship Sichuan (Type 076) is finishing her fitting out and has begun sea trials, though at present no additional hulls of either it or the Type 075 LHD have appeared. The same is true of the Type 071 LPD, which raises questions about what the PLAN intends for the force structure of its amphibious elements going forward. In the realm of destroyers, two Type 055 and two Type 052DL are presently running trials and will likely commission this year. Four and three ships of each respective class were launched in 2025, but no further hulls have been spotted under construction as of yet. There are two further Type 054AG hulls fitting out, but presently no additional hulls – and most notably, still no additional Type 054B hulls – have been identified. Type 054AG’s tend to come together rapidly so it’s possible there are still more in the works, but it may also be indicative of a pause in frigate production while the PLAN assesses what the future of its frigate force should be. It is also interesting to note that many of the remaining Type 053H3 frigates were reduced to training or test ships this year, leaving only three in frontline roles.

The VMF once again sees a slight uptick (+6,313t, or +0.29%), helped in no small part by 2025 being the first time in three years they have not suffered any notable losses to Ukrainian forces. The VMF commissioned an eighth Borei-class SSBN, as well two conventional attack submarines – one Kilo and one Lada – while definitively striking an Oscar II-class SSGN. It appears that the last pair of Sovremenny DDGs have definitively been retired or given up on, further reducing Russian blue water naval power. Two new corvettes, an OPV, an icebreaker, and an MCMV were commissioned this year, against the retirement of three older corvettes and two MCMV’s.

In this year’s first ‘upset’, the Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force recorded another solid year of growth (+14,414t, or +1.9%) and now claims the rank of fourth largest navy on this list, due more so to the misfortunes of the navy they leapfrogged. The JMSDF commissioned two Mogami-class frigates, a fourth Taigei-class SSK, and a fourth Awaji-class MCMV. At the same time, one older destroyer (DD), two Oyashio-class SSKs, and four Sugashima-class MCMV’s were decommissioned. Submarine construction in Japan continues at a regular pace, while surface combatant production looks like it will accelerate. All four of the remaining Mogami-class frigates have been launched as of the end of 2025, and will be followed by the two large ASEV ballistic missile defense ships and the twelve 06FFM type frigates, which will include at least additional three vessels built in Japan for the Royal Australian Navy. It is not clear yet whether any of these surface combatants have started construction yet.

The British Royal Navy had a rough 2025, and has fallen to fifth place for two reasons (-208,979t, or -23.9%). The first is organizational – this year I have decided to strike chartered ships from all navies, as previously only some navies (such as the Royal Navy and Marine Nationale) had chartered ships counted towards them, while others that had them (such as the JMSDF) did not. I decided to err on the side of simplification and struck all of them down, which reduced the size of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary in this list (by 127,000t). On the other hand, the RN and RFA both hemorrhaged a considerable number of assets. From the Royal Navy, both Albion-class LPDs and two Type 23-class frigates were decommissioned, along with the last Trafalgar-class SSN. The Royal Fleet Auxiliary lost both Wave-class AOR’s. These seven vessels totaled 117,220t. In exchange, the sixth Astute-class SSN, and the MCM mothership Stirling Castle, were both commissioned, somewhat taking the sting off of the losses (+13,240t). Additionally, the RN’s displacement is slightly buoyed as I have corrected the displacement of the Queen Elizabeth-class carriers from 70,000t to 80,500t, which is more reflective of their operational full load displacement and in line with other aircraft carriers. All in all, the real net change is more in the region of -103,980t (-13.5%).

With that said, it appears the Royal Navy is close to reaching the nadir of its fortunes in 2025, provided no additional frigates bow out of service early. The RN is benefitting from a robust albeit significantly delayed frigate construction program, and with the launch of the HMS Venturer, the first Type 31 frigate, there are now three surface combatants fitting out for the Royal Navy with another five under construction, and a further five awarded. Likewise, first steel was cut on the first of three Resurgent-class Fleet Solid Support ships for the Royal Fleet Auxiliary in December 2025. Additionally, SSN availability should improve in the next few years as the major constraint on servicing these vessels – the unavailability of drydocks – has abated significantly this year, with only one remaining out of service (the No.10 Dock at HMNB Devonport) until refurbishment is completed in 2027.

The Indian Navy, on the other hand, had a very good year – the best since 2022 (+44,359t, or +7.2%). In 2025 India commissioned the fourth and final Visakhapatnam-class (P15B) destroyer along with the first three Nilgiri-class (P17A) frigates, an eighth Talwar-class frigate (Russian built, Project 11356) and three ASW-SWC type corvettes. They also commissioned the sixth and final Kalvari-class (a Scorpène class) SSK. 2026 will likely also be a bumper year, with the Indian Navy expecting to commission its third SSBN and at least two more Nilgiri-class frigates, along with a swathe of ASW-SWC. If the final pair of Nilgiri do not commission in 2026, they will likely commission in 2027.

The Marine Nationale had a somewhat deceptive year with a slight contraction (-6,208t, or -1.4%), though most of this was due to removed chartered vessels (5,240t) from this list. The ‘real’ contraction was only 968t, due to turnover in patrol and MCM forces, and the retirement of the third Rubis-class SSN (technically in December 2024, but it seems to have escaped my tally for that year). Despite this, the MN’s immediate future is fairly positive – they accepted delivery of the second Jacques Chevalier-class BRF in 2025, as well as the first Amiral Ronarc’h-class frigate. Both will commission in 2026, and should be joined by the fourth Suffren-class SSN.

The Marina Militare had another robust growth year (+25,874t, or 6.8%), once again propelling it ahead of the ROKN. This was driven by the commissioning of two Carlo Bergamini-class frigates (FREMM) and Atlante, the second Vulcano-class logistical support ship (+40,980t). This was tempered by the withdrawal of the last Cold War major surface combatants, destroyer Francesco Mimbelli and frigate Grecale. Further reductions included the transfer of one of the Cassiopea-class OPVs to the Albanian navy, and the decommissioning of a Lerici-class MCMV along with a coastal research vessel and two floating drydocks. As in 2024, in 2025 the MMI was ‘down’ one PPA, as the sixth vessel ‘should’ have commissioned this year but instead was delivered to the Indonesian Navy. Contrary to expectations, construction on these ships did not start in 2025, but they were contracted in June and should start construction in 2026, along with the second FREMM-EVO. They may also be joined by the first DDX, as the mechanisms to start the contracting process started recently and it seems likely that contract will be signed in the first half of 2026. The seventh PPA, Domenico Millelire, should be delivered to the Marina Militare this coming year, along with the hydrographic ship Quirinale.

The Republic of Korea Navy slightly contracted in 2025 (-2,510t, or -0.6%), as it decommissioned one of the three remaining Pohang-class corvettes and the submarine Jang Bogo – its first domestically produced submarine, a variant of the German Type 209/1200. In contrast to 2024, no new vessels were inducted into the ROKN in 2025. An ongoing program to modernize the surface and submarine fleet is ongoing, with one destroyer, two frigates, and one submarine fitting out and another destroyer and two submarines under construction, but it is not clear if any of these vessels will commission in 2026.

Finally, the Indonesian Navy has staged an upset and reclaimed tenth place from their Turkish counterparts, achieving significant growth this year (+21,889t, or +6.6%) thanks to both domestic production, and the rapid delivery of two Paolo Thaon di Revel-class ‘OPVs’ (or frigates) in the Light+ configuration from Italy, bought as they were fitting out for the Marina Militare. The most significant domestic this year was a second Bung Karno-class corvette, with most other additional craft being smaller patrol craft – some of which were commissioned at the tail end of 2024, and did not make it into my final tally for 2025. Notable for Indonesian shipbuilding, this year they launched the first of the ‘Red-White’ frigates, known know as the Balaputradewa-class – derivatives of the Danish Iver Huitfeldt-class air warfare frigates.

Though they did not make the cut this year, I will include a brief mention of the Turkish Navy given they are still a close eleventh, and the gap between them and the next largest navy (the ROCN) is quite considerable. The Türk Deniz Kuvvetleri, in my tracker, has lost some tonnage, though this is the result of a vessel being previously erroneously double-counted in the data set, which has since been corrected. The TDK overall had a quieter year of deliveries than 2024, commissioning the second Reis-class SSK and the first of a new class of LCT, the Ç-159. However, in construction programs things have been more active, with three Istanbul-class frigates launched in 2025, along with the third Reis-class submarine.