It has been almost 19 months since the future USCGC Argus was launched and more than five years since the keel was laid, but still have no news about progress on the ship. It is in the water but no reports of sea trials, no videos of the ship underway. This is not normal!
Not only that, but no news on any of the other three ships contracted to Eastern. The most recent public report is that Eastern started cutting steel for the fourth OPC on October 18, 2022. Chase was supposed to be a year behind Argus, but no indication when it will be launched. Eastern’s own web site “LATEST OPC NEWS STORIES” lists only a story about the launch and christening of Argus.
I did find this rather disturbing quote from “opening remarks, as prepared, of Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Subcommittee Chairman Mike Ezell (R-MS) from…hearing, entitled “America Builds: Coast Guard Acquisitions and Infrastructure” dated March 5, 2025 which seems to indicate substantial problems remain and that even the National Security Cutter program may not have been as successful as previously portrayed.
Concerns with the Offshore Patrol Cutter Program remain as we prepare for the lead ship to be delivered at the end of this year — four years late, and with a host of non-compliant parts. In addition, new problems have developed with the last hulls in the National Security Cutter Program, and we could receive one ship less than what Congress appropriated.
Hopefully the remark, “we could receive one ship less than what Congress appropriated” refers to the 12th NSC rather than the 11th.
I have more confidence in the capabilities of Austal. They successfully completed large contracts for Independence class Littoral Combat Ships and Expeditionary Fast Transports and the Navy has given them a contract for five Navajo class Towing, Salvage, and Rescue (T-ATS) ships.
From Austal’s website,
“Through continual capital investments, over $500 million to date, Austal USA has expanded its capability and capacity to enable concurrent production of aluminum and steel ships. The company recently broke ground on a new assembly building which will provide 192,000 square feet of new covered manufacturing space. The building will consist of three bays, two of which will be sized specifically to erect the OPC.”
These delays and uncertainties only reinforce my opinion that we need to seek an alternative to replace at least some of the planned 25 OPCs.
The world has changed substantially since the requirements for OPCs were formulated about 12 years ago.
We need more than the 36 large patrol cutters currently planned. We have not had so few since before World War II, until very recently. Meanwhile, demand for Coast Guard presence has been increasing. The FRCs have taken on missions that used to be performed by medium endurance cutters but they do have limited endurance and seakeeping.
Because some time in their, probably 40 year, life new cutters, missions will change and there is a good chance the US will be engaged in a major war, the design of our ships needs to flexible enough to take on additional missions and incorporate additional weapon systems. OPCs and NSC don’t have mission bays or container space that might allow greater flexibility. They don’t seem to be designed to take on any particular wartime missions. The low speed of the OPCs will limit their tactical utility.




























