No News About Eastern’s Offshore Patrol Cutters / OPC Alternatives

Future USCGC Argus at launch Eastern Shipyard

No News from Eastern: 

I was hoping for some news about Eastern’s progress on the Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC) program, but I could not find any. Eastern has contracts to build four ships,

  • Argus (915) and Chase (916) to go to San Pedro, CA
  • Ingham (917) and Rush (918) to go to Kodiak, AK

Reported milestones for the four ships are as follows:

  • Argus:     Steel cut Jan. 7, 2019; Keel laid April 28, 2020; launched Oct. 27, 2023
  • Chase:    Steel cut April 27, 2020; Keel laid May 27, 2021
  • Ingham:  Steel cut Sep. 27, 2021; Keel laid July 15, 2022
  • Rush:     Steel cut Oct. 18, 2022

Nothing since October 2023, not even a report of keel laying for Rush, which should have happened in 2023. Was Rush’s keel laid? Are sea trials being conducted on Argus? WTFO!

The Planned Timeline:

The Congressional Research Service report, “Coast Guard Cutter Procurement: Background and Issues for Congress” noted.

“The posting for the RFP for the Stage 2 industry studies (October 11, 2019–Chuck) included an attached notional timeline for building the 25 OPCs. Under the timeline, OPCs 1 through 7 (i.e., OPCs 1-4, to be built by ESG, plus OPCs 5-7, which are the first three OPCs to be built by the winner of the Stage 2 competition) are to be built at a rate of one per year, with OPC-1 completing construction in FY2022 and OPC-7 completing construction in FY2028. The remaining 18 OPCs (i.e., OPCs 8 through 25) are to be built at a rate of two per year, with OPC-8 completing construction in FY2029 and OPC-25 completing construction in FY2038.

Using these dates—which are generally 10 months to about two years later than they would have been under the Coast Guard’s previous (i.e., pre-October 11, 2019) timeline for the OPC.

The Current Optimistic Timeline: 

We are in the middle of FY2025 and still waiting for OPC#1, so we are at least an additional three years late on delivery of USCGC Argus and we are almost certainly an additional two years late getting the first ship from Austal (though I am hoping for a pleasant surprise).

Eastern was expected to deliver one ship every year. I would have expected construction to speed up with experience, but the intervals between steel successive steel cuttings and between successive keel layings never got down to 12 months. But let us presume that Argus OPC #1 will be delivered in 2025 and Eastern will deliver #2- 4 at 12 month intervals.

Austal started cutting steel for OPC #5, Pickering (WMSM-919), on August 29, 2024. I assume they will deliver four years after starting steel cutting and annually thereafter with two per year delivered after #7. It should look like this.

  • 2025 #1
  • 2026 #2
  • 2027 #3
  • 2028 #4 & #5
  • 2029 #6
  • 2030 #7
  • 2031 #8 & #9
  • 2032 #10 & #11 These will replace the last of WMEC210s
  • 2033 #12 & #13. These will begin replacement of Alex Healy and the 13 WMEC270s
  • 2034 #14 & #15 These are the last that will be built under existing contracts
  • 2035 #16 & #17
  • 2036 #18 & #19
  • 2037 #20 & #21 These will begin replacement of the six SLEP WMEC270s
  • 2038 #22 & #23
  • 2039 #24 & #25 These will replace the last of the WMEC 270s

This does assume a smooth continuation of the program, delivering two ships a year without interruption even after exercising all options and completion of existing contracts.

All the WMEC210s will not be replaced until 2032. At that point even the youngest of the 210s would be 63 years old. It is by no means certain any will last that long, but Reliance is already 61 years old.

All WMECs would be replaced by the end of 2039 by which time the youngest WMEC270 will be 48 years old.

Will the program continue uninterrupted after the completion of the currently optioned 15 OPCs? This would be easy only if Austal wins the contract for a Phase 3. Is that a forgone conclusion?

If some other company wins the Phase 3 contract, will they also initially deliver the first three ships at the rate of one ship per year as was done with the first two contracts?

Alternatives: 

It can take up to ten years from the beginning of planning to delivery of the first ship. In reality it has taken considerably longer for the first OPC to get this far and we still no finished product. Even if all options are exercised, the last currently contracted OPC will be funded in FY2030 or 2031.

Do we still want to be building a design in 2030 that is 15 years old? Does the Coast Guard now own the design that could be handed over to another contractor to build the last ten ships or would a third yard have to provide a third detailed design, creating a “C” class of OPC?

Now is the appropriate time to consider alternatives.

Assuming we want to continue with the same design, Phase Three might be started with the idea of awarding a contract in FY2027 and delivering one additional OPC each year 2032, 2033, and 2034 by either Austal or a competing shipyard, with the winner producing two per year thereafter, until all 25 are completed. It would allow completion of all 25 a year and a half earlier.

If we want to look at an alternative that could replace the last ten currently planned OPCs and start delivering ships by 2035, we should issue an RFP in 2026.

There are two directions this new design could go.

  • A cheaper design that can be made in larger numbers.  A primary goal would be a smaller crew as a way to reduce operating costs.  It might be smaller and cheaper (we already have contracted for more than enough ships to do Alaska patrols), but should be able to support alternative mission modules and unmanned systems.
  • Ships that can be more readily upgraded for a wartime role. We might accelerate the design process by looking at the European Patrol Corvette, Australia’s Tier 2 combatant under the AUKUS umbrella, or if the country needs an ice capable combatant look at Finland’s Pohjanmaa-class corvette.

This Day in Coast Guard History, February 14

Based on the Coast Guard Historian’s timeline, https://www.history.uscg.mil/research/chronology/
With inspiration from Mike Kelso

February 14

1903  An Act of Congress (31 Stat. L., 825, 826, 827) that created the Department of Commerce and Labor provided for the transfer of the Lighthouse Service and the Steamboat Inspection Service from the Treasury Department.  This allowed the Secretary of Commerce and Labor to succeed to the authority vested in the Secretary of the Treasury under the existing legislation.

The crew of the Coast Guard Cutter Bruckenthal participates in a fueling exercise with the Coast Guard Cutter Campbell on the Chesapeake Bay, April 11, 2020. The Coast Guard acquired the first Sentinel Class cutter in 2012, with the namesake of each cutter being one of the service’s many enlisted heroes. (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Isaac Cross)

2016  CGC Campbell returned to its homeport at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, Maine, following a 61-day counter narcotics patrol of the Caribbean Sea and Eastern Pacific Ocean.  In the span of one month Campbell seized or disrupted a total of seven smuggling vessels carrying cocaine from South America bound for the United States.  The amount of cocaine seized was estimated to be 4,800 pounds and worth more than $80 million dollars.  In addition, Campbell’s crew rescued eight Cuban migrants attempting to sail from Cuba to the United States in an unseaworthy vessel.  Campbell deployed in support of the Joint-Interagency Task Force-South, which is in an international operation to disrupt the transportation of narcotics.  In doing so, Campbell worked with air, land, and naval assets from the U.S. Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security, as well as Western Hemisphere partner agencies, to counter drug trafficking.

“Ensuring Coast Guard Readiness Act”

The Geoje Shipyard Boasts the World’s Greatest Dock Turnover Rate
The dock turnover rate is the number of ships that a dock can launch ships. The greater the turnover rate indicates the more sophisticated shipbuilding capacity and production efficiency.
In addition, dock turnover rate is the most reliable yardstick for measuring shipyard’s technical capacity and production efficiency. The largest dock at SHI’s Geoje Shipyard, Dock No.3,is 640m long, 97.5m wide, and 13m deep.

Marine Link has an article, “S. Korea Shipyards Soar as U.S. Bill Eyes Navy, USCG Ship Construction Options” that reports

Senators Mike Lee (R-UT) and John Curtis (R-UT) have introduced two new bills aimed at enhancing the readiness and capabilities of the United States Navy and Coast Guard. The “Ensuring Naval Readiness Act” and the “Ensuring Coast Guard Readiness Act” seek to modernize shipbuilding processes and strengthen partnerships with allied nations to expedite maritime procurement.

The Coast Guard bill would allow”... the Coast Guard to construct a vessel or a major component of the hull or superstructure in a foreign shipyard if:
• The shipyard is located in a NATO country or in an Indo-Pacific country with which the U.S. has a current mutual defense agreement;
• The cost is cheaper in such shipyard than would otherwise be in a domestic shipyard;
• The Commandant of the Coast Guard to certifies, prior to construction of a U.S. vessel, that the foreign shipyard is not owned or operated by a Chinese company or multinational domiciled in China

Of course this is only a bill. 

“South Korea to Transfer BAE Jambelí to Ecuador to Strengthen Its Maritime Capability in Pacific” –Navy News

BAE Jambelí, Former S. Korean Coast Guard cutter KCG3001 (screen grab)

Navy News reports that South Korea is transferring a 30 year old Coast Guard cutter to Ecuador,

“The Ecuadorian Navy will soon receive an addition to its fleet with the transfer of the BAE Jambelí (MP-56), a large patrol vessel previously part of the South Korean Coast Guard. The ship’s transfer to Ecuador, officially announced in mid-2024, highlights the strengthening of international cooperation and the strategic realignment of military resources between nations.”

The ship was the former S. Korean Cutter KCG3001.

KCG3001

Hull Vane Update

Below is a news release from Hull Vane. Not the first time I have passed along the reports of success with this adaptation and the suggestion that the Coast Guard should look at this.

“RNLN Patrol Ship Hull Vane Retrofit Matches Predicted Performance” –Naval News

“New Danish 64m Patrol Vessel Nordsøen optimised, built and delivered with Hull Vane®” –News Release

“Hull Vane To Be Fitted On Royal Netherlands Navy OPV” –Naval News

“Dutch Navy To Test Hull Vane Hydrofoil On HNLMS Zeeland OPV” –Naval News

Hull Vane Experiment on 52 Meter OPV

Hull Vane Claims Improved Performance

Hull Vane on an OPV


Hull Vane and TotalEnergies conducted a pilot project by installing a Hull Vane® on one of the company’s chartered Fast Support Vessels (FSVs) in order to reduce the CO2 emissions. Following successful sea trials, which confirmed the predicted savings in fuel consumption and CO2 emissions, and having used the Hull Vane® for several months in operation, TotalEnergies confirms the fuel saving of 11% in general.

The pilot project was done on Ava J McCall, a 59m (194 ft) Fast Support Vessel owned by Seacor Marine, and designed by Incat Crowther. The vessel is in operation in West-Africa, transporting goods and personnel to the oil fields offshore Nigeria. Ava J McCall is powered by five waterjets, with a combined propulsion power of just over 10.000 kW. Hydrodynamic studies at Hull Vane showed that the Hull Vane® would save around 10% in fuel consumption at the ship’s typical operating speeds of between 15 to 25 knots. The Hull Vane®, built in the Netherlands, was shipped to Ivory Coast where it was installed during Ava J McCall’s scheduled maintenance period in late 2022.

The Naval Architects of Incat Crowther USA took care of the structural integration of the Hull Vane®. The Hull Vane® is placed underneath the waterjets, and does not increase the draft, the beam or the length of the vessel. Upon completion, DP trials showed no effect on the Dynamic Positioning Capabilities of the vessel, which has DP-2 notation.

Once in operation, the fuel consumption data was compared with the measurements after the last dry-docking, a year ago, to eliminate the effect of cleaning and re-painting the hull. Ava J McCall now consumes 14% less at 16 knots and 9% less at 21 knots. This is a bit higher and very close to the CFD predicted results. Over a full year, the CO2 reduction provided by the Hull Vane® on Ava J McCall amounts to 650 tons. That’s 250.000 litres of diesel less consumed per year.

“We are constantly looking for ways to reduce the carbon footprint of our operations, and when we found out about Hull Vane®, our interest was raised,” said David Flajolet, Marine Specialist at TotalEnergies. The pilot project we did with Hull Vane® has been a success; contrary to most of the decarbonizing systems on board vessels, Hull Vane® does not require active management from the crew and this is a key point for us. Its ability to be retrofitted for a limited cost and technical complexity make the solution a quick win for TotalEnergies. Further to the return of experience with the Ava J Mc Call, it has been decided to make it mandatory on the future Call for Tender for FSIVs in Nigeria.

Niels Moerke, CEO of Hull Vane BV: “There are now six FSV’s operating with Hull Vanes worldwide, and on all of them, savings have been proven to exceed 10% over their operational profile. It has been a real pleasure to work with TotalEnergies, and we are delighted with this solid endorsement of our solution. We think that TotalEnergies is right that oil majors should take the initiative to apply Hull Vane® in the offshore market. Hull Vane® is probably the easiest way for oil majors to reduce their operational CO2 emissions without impacting their actual operation. With relative short payback periods ranging from one to three years for these kinds of vessels, it’s also a risk-free investment. We look forward to design and build the Hull Vanes for other FSVs in the fleet chartered by TotalEnergies

This Day in Coast Guard History, February 13

Based on the Coast Guard Historian’s timeline, https://www.history.uscg.mil/research/chronology/
With inspiration from Mike Kelso

February 13

Douglas R5D-3; “OFF TO HEAT AN ICEBERG: A 1,000-pound thermite bomb enclosing a cluster of small bomblets, each capable of burning at a temperature of 4,300 degrees Fahrenheit, rides under the wing of a Coast Guard UF-2G amphibian plane toward an iceberg target in the foggy Grand Banks region of Newfoundland. The temperature of one bomblet equals half the sun’s surface temperature. This bomb was one of twenty cluster bomb of thermite and petroleum types air-dropped on selected icebergs during heat destruction tests made by the International Ice Patrol force in June, at the height of the 1959 heavy ice season. Above the bomb carrier is a large passenger type Coast Guard R5D plane, one of three used on regular ice observation flights out of Argentia, Nfld. The more modern R5Ds this year replaced old World War II B-17 bomber type planer with plexiglass noses where ice observation instruments and carries a crew of about seven. Ice is observed from many windows. Averaging 6 to 8 hour ice observation flights, the R5D patrols an area of about 14,000 square miles in the Grand Banks region. The R5D plane here wears one of the new paint schemes currently being tested for easy air visibility by the U.S. Coast Guard on its various planes. In place of the dull silver gray and orange trim formerly used, the new dress is made of glowing fluorescent colors–orange nose, wing tips, tail and body strip with black edgings, and main body in brilliant white.”; Photo No. 5854; 17 July 1959; photographer unknown.

1960  A Coast Guard R5D aircraft from Honolulu dropped a pump to the Japanese training vessel Toyama Maru, which had radioed that it was taking on water and was in danger of sinking off Palmyra Island.  The pump controlled flooding until the arrival of CGC Bering Strait, whose crew made repairs to the Japanese vessel, using 2,500 pounds of sand and cement parachuted by a Honolulu-based SC-130B plane.

1963  The Bureau of Customs requested Coast Guard assistance to search the M/V Holland Diepe in Tacoma, Washington, for narcotics.  Narcotics agents had previously apprehended three Chinese crew members of the vessel in a Seattle hotel.  COTP Seattle provided a search party of two officers and eight enlisted men, who were joined by 10 Customs agents.  Two-man teams searched assigned areas of the vessel.  A first search of seven hours uncovered a considerable quantity of raw opium.  The search party then departed, as if the search were ended, but 45 minutes later they boarded the vessel once more, lined up the crew in the mess hall, and searched them and the ship again.  This search, lasting three hours, uncovered more opium, both raw and prepared for smoking, a small quantity of heroin, and several opium pipes.  A total of six pounds of opium was seized.  WPB 82336 conducted waterside surveillance during the search.

1969  The National Transportation Safety Board issued its “Study of Recreational Boat Accidents, Boating Safety Programs, and Preventive Recommendations”.

In response to the Iraqi action of firing oil wells and pumping stations in Kuwait, two HU-25A Falcon jets from Air Station Cape Cod, equipped with Aireye technology, which precisely locates and records oil as it floats on water], departed for Saudi Arabia. The Falcons mapped over 40,000 square miles in theatre and located every drop of oil on the water. This was used to produce a daily updated surface analysis of the location, condition and drift projections of the oil. The Aviation Detachment was deployed for 84 days, flew 427 flight hours and maintained an aircraft readiness rate of over 96 percent.

1991  During Operation Desert Storm, two HU-25A Falcon jets from Air Station Cape Cod, equipped with AIREYE technology, departed for Saudi Arabia for service with the Inter-agency oil spill assessment team. They were accompanied in flight by two C-130 aircraft from Air Station Clearwater carrying spare parts and deployment packages.

USCGC Emlen Tunnell (WPC-1145) / “CMF’s Combined Task Force 150 Carries Out First Drug Interdiction with New Zealand In Command” –NAVCENT

(February 7, 2025) Coast Guardsmen from the U.S. Coast Guard Sentinel-class fast response cutter USCGC Emlen Tunnell (WPC 1145) seize illegal narcotics from a stateless vessel in the Arabian Sea. (Photo by U.S. Coast Guard)

Below is a news release from Commander U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs.

221207-N-NO146-1001 ARABIAN GULF (Dec. 7, 2022) An Aerovel Flexrotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) takes off from U.S. Coast Guard fast response cutter USCGC Emlen Tunnell (WPC 1145) transiting the Arabian Gulf, Dec. 7. U.S. 5th Fleet’s Task Force 59 launched the UAV during Digital Horizon, a three-week event focused on integrating new unmanned and artificial intelligence platforms, including 10 that are in the region for the first time. (U.S. Navy photo)


ANAMA, Bahrain —

A U.S. Coast Guard fast-response cutter, working in direct support of New Zealand-led Combined Task Force (CTF) 150 of Combined Maritime Forces, seized nearly 2,400 kilograms of illegal drugs from a vessel in the Arabian Sea, Feb. 7.

The interdiction by the Sentinel-class fast-response cutter USCGC Emlen Tunnell (WPC-1145) represents CTF 150’s first drug seizure since New Zealand assumed command Jan. 15.

The cutter’s boarding team discovered and seized 2,357kg of hashish from the vessel. After weighing and documenting the haul, the crew properly disposed of the narcotics.

Commodore Rodger Ward, commander of CTF 150, said he’s proud of the team effort that went into making this interdiction a reality after only a few weeks in command.

“Our command is a small cog in a system focused on interdicting illicit trafficking on the high seas,” Ward said. “This is a team effort and this bust would not have been possible without the support of the 46 nations who make up the Combined Maritime Forces.”

Ward noted that every bust we make reduces the flow of finances to terrorist organizations. “This is why we’re here, to contribute to maritime security and protect the rules-based international order,” he said.

Emlen Tunnell is forward deployed to Bahrain. The fast response cutter is part of a contingent of U.S. Coast Guard ships operating in the region under Patrol Forces Southwest Asia (PATFORSWA). PATFORSWA deploys Coast Guard personnel and ships alongside U.S. and regional naval forces throughout the Middle East.

CTF 150 is one of five task forces under Combined Maritime Forces, the world’s largest international naval partnership. CTF 150’s mission is to deter and disrupt the ability of non-state actors to move weapons, drugs and other illicit substances in the Indian Ocean, the Arabian Sea and the Gulf of Oman.

Combined Maritime Forces is a 46-nation naval partnership upholding the international rules-based order by promoting security and stability across 3.2 million square miles of water encompassing some of the world’s most important shipping lanes.

This Day in Coast Guard History, February 12

Based on the Coast Guard Historian’s timeline, https://www.history.uscg.mil/research/chronology/
With inspiration from Mike Kelso

February 12

1802  Revenue Marine had a total of 38 commissioned officers in service: 9 captains, 10 first mates, 9 second mates and 10 third mates.

The Marine Electric, a 605-foot cargo ship, as seen underway before its capsizing and sinking on Feb. 12, 1983. The converted WWII-era ship foundered 30 miles off the coast of Virginia and capsized, throwing most of its 34 crew into 37-degree water, where 31 of them drowned or succumbed to hypothermia.

1983  The 605-foot bulk carrier Marine Electric, completed as a tanker in 1944, capsized and sank off Virginia during a gale.  Three of the 34 crewmen on board were rescued by Coast Guard and Navy assets.

“Investigations by the Coast Guard, led by Captain Dominic Calicchio and independent examinations of the wreck discovered that the Marine Electric had left port in an un-seaworthy condition, with gaping holes in its deck plating and hatch covers. These had been noted at multiple points by surviving Chief Mate Bob Cusick, who testified that no effort had been made by MTL to rectify the issues.[6] The hatch covers, in particular, posed a problem, since without them the cargo hold could fill with water in the storm and drag the ship under.

Investigators discovered that much of the paperwork supporting MTL’s declarations that the Marine Electric′s seaworthiness was faked. Inspection records showed inspections of the hatch covers during periods when they had in fact been removed from the ship for maintenance; inspections were recorded during periods of time when the ship was not in port. A representative of the hatch covers’ manufacturer warned MTL in 1982 that their condition posed a threat to the ship’s seaworthiness, but inspectors never tested them. Yet the Marine Electric was repeatedly certified as seaworthy.

Part of the problem was that the Coast Guard delegated some of its inspection authority to the American Bureau of Shipping. The ABS is a private, non-profit agency that developed rules, standards and guidelines for ship’s hulls. In the wake of the Marine Electric tragedy, questions were raised about how successfully the ABS was exercising the inspection authority delegated to it, as well as about whether the Coast Guard even had the authority to delegate that role. Also there was a conflict of interest in that the inspection fees paid to the ABS were paid by the ship owners.

In the wake of the Marine Electric sinking, The Philadelphia Inquirer assigned two reporters, Tim Dwyer and Robert Frump, to look into old ship catastrophes. In the series, the writers concluded that government programs designed to strengthen the merchant marine had actually kept unsafe ships afloat. Frump later wrote a book, Until the Sea Shall Free Them, about the sinking.

In the wake of the Marine Board report, and the newspaper’s investigation, the Coast Guard dramatically changed its inspection and oversight procedures. The Coast Guard report noted that the ABS, in particular, “cannot be considered impartial”, and described its failure to notice the critical problems with the ship as negligent. At the same time, the report noted that “the inexperience of the inspectors who went aboard the Marine Electric, and their failure to recognize the safety hazards…raises doubt about the capabilities of the Coast Guard inspectors to enforce the laws and regulations in a satisfactory manner.”

While the Coast Guard commandant did not accept all of the recommendations of the Marine Board report, inspections tightened and 90 old World War II relics still functioning 40 years after the war were sent to scrap yards.(“Disasters at Sea” S01E02 Deadly Neglect 2019). In 2003, Coast Guard Captain Dominic Calicchio was posthumously awarded The Plimsoll Award by Professional Mariner magazine in part because of his role as a member of the Marine Board of Investigation.

Additionally, the Coast Guard required that survival suits be required on all winter North Atlantic runs. Later, as a direct result of the casualties on the Marine Electric, Congress pushed for and the Coast Guard eventually established the now famous Coast Guard Rescue Swimmer program.

1986  Rains began in northern California that lasted for a week, causing severe flooding.  Coast Guard units participated in rescue and relief operations.

CG 44363 in its final resting place on James Island. U.S. Coast Guard photo

1997  Three of the four crewmembers of MLB-44363 out of the Quillayute River Motor Lifeboat Station were lost in the line of duty when they responded to a distress call from the sailing vessel Gale Runner.  They were BM2 David A. Bosley, MK3 Matthew E. Schlimme, and SN Clinton P. Miniken. Staffing levels and high personnel turnover contributed to the incident. A summary of findings is here. Two items stand out.

No member of the boat crew was wearing helmets. Additionally, only SA Wingo and SN Miniken definitively wore their heavy weather belts. SA Wingo assumed that MK3 Schlimme wore his and was clipped in as well, but he was unsure if BM2 Bosley wore his belt.

The autopsy reports for BM2 Bosley, MK3 Schlimme, and SN Miniken all stated that the cause of death was blunt force injuries to the head.

This Day in Coast Guard History, February 11

Based on the Coast Guard Historian’s timeline, https://www.history.uscg.mil/research/chronology/
With inspiration from Mike Kelso

February 11

1973  Due to the draw-down of U.S. forces in South Vietnam the post of Senior Coast Guard Officer, Vietnam, was discontinued.

Norfolk, VA, 27 March 2009 – The guided-missile cruiser USS Vella Gulf (CG 72) returns to Naval Station Norfolk after a seven-month deployment. Vella Gulf deployed as part of the Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group supporting maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. 5th and 6th Fleet areas of responsibility.
U.S. Navy photo #090327-N-3595W-045 by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Gina K. Wollman/Released

2009  Miami-based LEDET 405, operating as part of Combined Task Force (CTF) 151 and conducting counter-piracy operations aboard USS Vella Gulf (CG-72) and USS Mahan (DDG-72) in the Gulf of Aden, assisted in the apprehension of 16 suspected pirates in a 24-hour period.

Brigands attacked Marshall Islands-flagged motor vessel Polaris in the Gulf of Aden, and she issued a distress call at 1500 on 11 February 2009. Vella Gulf came about, made speed for the area, and captured seven pirates. At 1600 the following day, additional pirates in a skiff fired at Indian-flagged Prem Divya and attempted to board the merchantman. A Seahawk flying from Vella Gulf raced to the area and signaled for the skiff to stop. The pirates continued and the helo fired a warning shot, which the pirates also ignored. The Seahawk then fired a second warning shot and the skiff stopped. VBSS teams from Vella Gulf and Mason boarded the boat and apprehended nine more pirates, together with their weapons, including a rocket propelled grenade launcher. The cruiser transferred the 16 pirates to a temporary holding facility on board the dry cargo ship Lewis and Clark (T AKE 1).

Artists rendering from Eastern Shipbuilding Group

2014  The Coast Guard awarded three firm fixed-price contracts for preliminary and contract design for the Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC) acquisition project.  The contracts were awarded to Bollinger Shipyards Lockport LLC (Lockport, Louisiana), Eastern Shipbuilding Group Inc. (Panama City, Florida), and General Dynamics, Bath Iron Works (Bath, Maine).  The OPC would fill Coast Guard and DHS offshore mission requirements and provide capabilities between the Coast Guard’s Fast Response Cutter and National Security Cutter, while replacing the aging 210-foot and 270-foot medium endurance cutters. (And now, 11 years later, we still do not have our first OPC.)

The Reliance Class Cutter USCGC Valiant (WMEC-621) underway on a routine fisheries patrol in the Gulf of Mexico.

2015  CGC Valiant returned home to Naval Station Mayport Wednesday, after completing a six-week deployment in the Florida Straits and Eastern Caribbean Sea in support of operations Southeast Watch and Unified Resolve.  Valiant responded to a surge of illegal migration attempts in the Florida Straits following the U.S. government announcement to normalize relations with Cuba.  The cutter humanely processed and cared for 160 Cuban migrants in a one-week period.  Valiant also boarded and towed a coastal freighter following its failed attempt to deliver more than 1,000 kilograms of cocaine into Puerto Rico.  Valiant’s crewmembers conducted a search of the vessel, took custody of its crew, and towed the freighter over 120 miles to Ponce, Puerto Rico, where it was transferred to Homeland Security Investigations and Border Patrol authorities.  The freighter’s crew was turned over for prosecution in federal court.  During the cutter’s logistics stop in San Juan, Puerto Rico, the crew took time to visit two orphanages that care for infants and primary school children.  The crew distributed more than 200 new toys they brought with them from Mayport and spent two afternoons playing with the children.

Caleb Brewster, Revolutionary War Soldier, Spy and War of 1812 Revenue Cutter CO

Caleb Brewster was a secondary character in the TV series “Turn, Washington’s Spies,” but he was a main character in the formation of George Washington’s Culper spy ring and in Coast Guard history.

Brewster initiated the Culpepper spy ring,

“Again in the dark for critical intelligence, Washington, to his great relief, received an unsolicited letter written on August 7, 1778 – a day that could be considered the start of the Culper Spy Ring.  It was written by Caleb Brewster in Norwalk, offering to gather intelligence on Long Island Washington instructed Brewster to “not spare any reasonable expense to come at early and true information.” Brewster wrote his first intelligence report on August 27, 1778. He warned Washington that Sir Henry Clinton was planning to attack the Continental Army strong point in Newport, Rhode Island, allowing Washington to take precautions to avert an attack.”

He was wounded in a “spy boat fight”  the British in 1782.

Caleb Brewster was injured on December 7, 1782 during a naval exchange with British troops on Long Island Sound.  He was hit by a musket ball through his shoulder, or “breast,” as he described in his letter to President George Washington.

He commanded the Revenue Cutter Active 1812 to 1816.

During the War of 1812, the cutters Active and Eagle kept very busy escorting merchantmen between New England and the mid-Atlantic states.

Of the war’s revenue-cutter masters, Captain Caleb Brewster of the Active proved the most experienced intelligence-gatherer, having been part of an effective spy ring supplying information to General George Washington during the Revolutionary War. On 26 May 1813, a New York newspaper reported that the Active braved a “strong south gale” near Montauk Point, Long Island, to maintain surveillance of three British men-of-war about ten miles out to sea. Employing local small craft, Captain Brewster sped the information to U.S. Navy Commodore Stephen Decatur, whose squadron was trapped in Long Island Sound. Brewster continued providing military intelligence to New York officials regarding enemy naval operations until the war’s end.

During the summer of 1813, the cutter Active sailed through the British squadron blockading Commodore Decatur’s flotilla near New London, Connecticut. The Active provided force protection for Decatur’s warships and delivered reports, messages, and naval intelligence between the commoedore’s flotilla and authorities in New York.

22 January 1814 near Sandy Hook, New Jersey, when a boarding party from the Active inspected the merchant ship Fair American, which had special papers to sail for Liverpool, England. In what became a rather sensational story at the time, Caleb Brewster’s crew found 11 men without passports concealed in the ship’s hold and several men of wealth disguised as seamen. They caught others among the crew trying to destroy illegal documents. The Active’s boarding party found bills, orders, and drafts for supplying the Royal Navy and the British military in Canada and the West Indies and arrested a number of passengers, including two smuggled British prisoners of war. A New York newspaper described the incident as demonstrating “the development of a most nefarious and long continued system of smuggling, [and] victualing the British and contravening the most imperious laws and highest interests of the country.”

Why haven’t we named a cutter after this man?