The US Naval Institute Proceedings July 2013 edition has an article concerning US military policy in the Arctic, “When the Ice Melts,” written by three officers from the Navy, Air Force, and Army, which pays a lot of attention to the Coast Guard. Not much really new here and it appears a few months out of date, but still a good overview of the questions involved, if perhaps a bit too alarmist about the Chinese. It does advocate more Navy participation in the Arctic Shield Exercises.
Unfortunately the full article is only accessible to US Naval Institute members, but if you are a regular reader here, there is a good chance you should also be a USNI member.
A CV-22 Osprey aircraft from the 8th Special Operations Squadron flies over the Emerald Coast outside Hurlburt Field, Fla., on Jan. 31, 2009. While over the water, the crew practiced using a hoist, which is used to rescue stranded personnel. DOD photo by Senior Airman Julianne Showalter, U.S. Air Force. (Released)
DefenseNews reports members of Congress are questioning an Air Force proposal to use the V-22 Osprey tiltrotar in addition to the HH-60 for Combat Search and Rescue.
Opponents site the very strong downwash from the aircraft and higher cost.
Proponents site the V-22s higher speed and range.
It appears politics may also be at work here, surprise, surprise.
Thinkdefense recently reported on the test of a new application of the proven Brimstone missile. (They also have some additional video, and excellent commentary.) Three missiles were launched almost simultaneously against five boats (four stopped and one underway at about 20 knots) simulating a swarm attack. The three missiles each hit a separate target.
Targeting:
The thing that makes this missile so interesting is the range of options it provides the user to ensure that the right target is hit and there is little or no chance of collateral damage. It is equipped with an all weather millimetric radar that will show the shape of the target, and in the latest version semi-laser homing. It can be “fire and forget,” but it can also allow a “man-in-the-loop.” It can be given a laser designation and then continue to independently track the target. It has a terrain avoidance feature allowing it to hit targets on the far side of islands. A kill box can be designated so that it will ignore targets outside the box and self-destruct if it passes through the box without finding a target. Multiple rounds can be fired in a salvo, against one or more targets.
Will the US consider it?:
Clearly this weapon is being marketed to the US, including apparently for use on the Littoral Combat Ship as a competitor to an enhanced Griffin. US Special Forces have already shown an interest in the missile.
“BRIMSTONE is also being proposed as a surface-to-surface missile for deployment within the SEA SPEAR self-defence system against FIACs (fast inshore attack craft–Chuck) and other small surface threats. With a range of deck-mounted launcher options, from single to six-pack configurations, the system’s very small footprint gives it a high level of deck positioning flexibility making it suitable for small vessels such as FACs as well as much larger vessels such as auxiliary ships.”
Footprint:
It is relatively small, about 107 pounds, less than six feet long, and approximately seven inches in diameter. They claim it is suitable for vessels as small as 15 meters (50 feet).
Alternatives
The nearest similar missile in US service right now is the Hellfire. Brimstone developed out of a program to improve Hellfire, so not surprisingly, Hellfire is very similar in size but has a shorter range. Hellfire has been used on the Combat Boat 90 (a 52 foot boat). It does not have the sophisticated dual mode guidance and collateral damage avoidance features of the Brimstone. Several types have been built. Most are semi-active laser homing, but there is a millimetric radar homing version also, but it does not include the man-in-the-loop feature of the Brimstone. The model that appears most useful in a naval environment is the “N” model. The Thermobaric warhead does sound interesting.
AGM-114N Hellfire II
Target: Enclosures, ships, urban targets, air defense units
New weapons like this are beginning to give even very small craft the punch that once came only with something like a 5″ gun, but perhaps more importantly it allows a very precise application of force. That should be very important to the Coast Guard in that their units are most likely to operating in and around the US including densely populated areas.
This may not be a ship killing, or even ship stopping weapon (although it might help), but it might be useful against a different type of difficult target. We might someday need to stop a terrorist or an enemy in wartime employing a fast highly maneuverable craft operating inshore or among a number other vessels where gunfire is likely to cause civilian casualties. This system would be much safer, and more likely to succeed, than using guns, in that circumstance.
Too good to be true?
With the possibility of being surrounded, pushing one button, and wiping out all your enemies, I was reminded of this sequence from the movie “The Last Starfighter.”
Apparently, the former USCGC Ewing is up for sale, only $69,000. Considering how the Coast Guard’s budget has been cut, and shipbuilding has been slowed, perhaps the Coast Guard should get her back. It is only 86 years old.
“A proposed substitute amendment for the comprehensive immigration bill under consideration in the Senate that would increase border security funding by $38 billion and deploy an additional 20,000 Border Patrol agents to the southwestern border has livened prospects for bill passage in the Senate–although critics from left and right have been quick to criticize it.”
When border security gets tight on land, where do you think illegal immigration will spike?
An additional 20,000 agents is equal to half the size of the Coast Guard to perform only one mission, Alien Migrant Interdiction Operations (AMIO).
If no attempt is made to tighten the maritime borders, it is not to difficult to foresee what will happen.
Following news from the German Navy site Marine Forum, June 20, without additional attribution:
FRANCE: Defence minister indicates plans for long-term replacement of FLOREAL class patrol frigates with a new class of light (3,000 – 4,000 tons) frigates (Frégates de Taille Intermédiaire – FTI) … contract decision by end of decade with first ship arriving around 2025.
The lightly armed Floreal Class Frigates essentially serve as cruising cutters for the French Navy since they do not have an American style Coast Guard. Perhaps DCNS’s participation in the Offshore Patrol Cutter competition will serve them well in developing a contender.
DefenseNews reports the Brits have seen the need for a shipboard machine gun simulator. Considering how many 7.62mm and .50 cal machinegun mounts the Coast Guard uses–certainly more than the Royal Navy, it might be worth considering.
Chuck Hill's CG Blog 