Stern Ramps, a Scientific Study

Earlier we talked about the decision to specifically exclude use of a stern ramp in the specifications for the Offshore Patrol Cutter, “No Stern Ramp for Boats on the OPC-Mistake?”

I recently found a study that addressed this question. It’s conclusions seem particularly applicable to the Coast Guard:

The inclusion of a stern ramp has advantages in terms of  deployment and recovery speeds, but ultimately a stern ramp lacks availability in the higher sea states in which a davit is still capable of operation. The stern ramp availability is driven by sill depth and pitch motions, whilst a davit needs to consider a range of constraints associated with the environment, including pendulum effects, hoisting speed and the safety of deck crew.

–
Hence, a vessel designed to operate in benign to moderate sea conditions and requiring rapid boat response times may be appropriate for a stern ramp, as illustrated by their use mainly in coast guard and smaller patrol vessels. A vessel operating in higher sea states such as offshore environments, including conducting MCM and environmental assessment may select davit arrangements, accepting the increase in handling procedures to gain a greater environmental envelope. A flexible, multi-role naval vessel is therefore likely to err towards the later, because of  its greater flexibility and sea state envelope. A mixed solution may offer a compromise between these but suffers from the need to find space for both systems and requires training to cover several deployment methods, although the rapid response would be beneficial when operating in constabulary missions and may be an advantage to consider. In this case, the stern ramp is the secondary method of deployment and the mission space would be located midships with the davit system(s).

They also found that the relative success of stern ramps varied with the size of the “host” vessel, with it becoming more problematic as the size of the host vessel increased relative to the boat to be launched and recovered.

Late addition–Not sure why I did not link the original source when I posted, but here it is: Boat Launch and Recovery – BMT Group

Buoy Tender with a very Different Look

UT755S Buoy tenderThe Marine Log is reporting India has contracted for a new large buoy tender, and the resulting ship looks very different from what we are accustom to.

“The 71.2 m x 16.0 m vessel will be equipped with a 35 t crane and will have a 16 m diameter helicopter deck. It will be powered by two 2,000 kW diesels driving two C.P. propellers and will have two bow thrusters and one stern thruster, each rated at 590 kW.”

 

(Thanks to Lee for the lead)

China Attacks 378–Magazine Cover

The following was found here: http://www.timawa.net/forum/index.php?topic=32702.0

From “Modern Ships” (chinese mag) July 2012 ed. Literal translation:
“056 – Protectors of the South Sea”

The type 056 is a new Chinese Navy corvette being produced in large numbers by at least four different ship yards.

The 378 in the background is the former USCGC Hamilton, now Gregorio del Pilar (PF-15), still in CG white paint rather than Philippine Navy Gray.

 

Antarctic Explorer Scott’s Ship Found

A bit over 100 years ago Captain Robert F. Scott, and Norwegian Roald Amundsen raced to reach the South Pole. Scott’s ill fated party lost the race and died attempting to return, after finding Amundsen’s group had arrived 33 days earlier. The remains of the ship that carried the Scott’s party, SS Terra Nova, has been located off Greenland. More here.

SS Terra Nova, was much like the cutter Bear, both were built as sealers in Dundee Scotland. After the expedition, Terra Nova played various roles until it was damaged by ice during WWII on a supply run to Greenland in 1943. The Coast Guard icebreaker Southwind rescued the survivors.

File:Herbert Ponting Scott's ship Terra Nova 1910.jpg

Sea Shepherds, CG May See These Guys

There seems to be proliferation of non-state entity “navies” lately. We have been expecting protests from “Green Peace” against drilling in the Arctic.

Informationdissemination.net/20has some information about the “Sea Shepherds” efforts to expand their fleet, and it looks like the next vessel may be either an icebreaker or at least an ice strengthened vessel. They also note how these groups seem to splinter and create additional new organizations.

 

UAS Developments

There has been some interesting news on unmanned air systems (UAS).

A “sense and avoid” radar system has been developed for the the Navy’s Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (BAMS) land based system. Replacing “See and Avoid” with no eyes on board has been a problem in integrating UAS with the domestic air traffic control system. This system does not give all around detection, but then eyes don’t see under the plane or what is coming up behind either.

Lighter than air, or in this case slightly heavier than air always seems almost ready. The Army and Northrop Grumman’s optionally manned long endurance, multi-intelligence vehicle (LEMV). has had its first flight.

“HAV business development director Hardy Giesler told AIN today that, configured as a freighter, the airship could carry a payload of 20 tonnes, but for the ISR mission it is designed to carry a 2,500-pound payload at 20,000 feet for 21 days. The Army says the airship will perform the ISR mission with fuel consumption 10 times less than that of mission-comparable platforms, and that it will provide a 2,000-mile radius of action.”
There is also a report that the few land based drones the Department of Homeland security has employed over water have not been as successful as might have been hoped. It does look like this report originated with Customs and Border Protection’s aviation unit. They might have their own agenda.