Potential $198.1M Contract Award for Cutter-Based V-BAT UAS

V-Bat from Martin UAV

Below is a news release. The total contract ceiling award amount is $198,106,876.21 over five years.

Compared to Scan Eagle, currently used on Coast Guard National Security Cutters, V-Bat system has a slightly smaller wing span than the ScanEagle (9′ vs 10’3″) and weighs about twice as much (88 lbs (40 kg) vs 44-48.5 lb. (22 kg)), heavier, but still easily handled. Payload can be as much as three times that of Scan Eagle. There is a skid under the nose to allows the V-BAT to be laid on the deck. Cruise speeds are similar. Dash speed is actually a little higher for the V-BAT (90 vs 80 knots).

There are a couple of things worth noting in this release that point toward a broadening of Coast Guard use of cutter based UAS.

While the contract is for “Contractor Owned Contractor Operated (COCO)” services, it includes service pilot and mission training which suggests that Coast Guard personnel will be learning to operate these systems and,

“Initially, the contract will be used to continue UAS capability on the national security cutter class; however, the contract can be used to support additional cutter classes in the future.”

USCGC Harriet Lane, after a change of homeport to Honolulu, completed her first Pacific patrol in April. As I noted, she apparently had no helicopter or UAS on board during a more than 70 day patrol, far from the nearest Coast Guard air station.

In 2020, V-BAT was successfully tested on Harriet Lane. V-BAT requires no catapult or recovery hardware. It should be possible to operate the system from any medium endurance cutter. Bear class 270 foot cutters, like Harriet Lane, could probably deploy with both a helicopter and more than one V-BAT.

V-BAT Vertical takeoff and landing UAV. Photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Anderson W. Branch

Coast Guard awards contract to procure cutter-based unmanned aircraft system capability

The Coast Guard awarded a contract on June 26, 2024, to Shield AI Inc. of San Diego for unmanned aircraft system (UAS) capability that can be deployed from Coast Guard cutters. The indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity firm fixed-price contract runs through 2029 and is structured as five one-year ordering periods.

This contractor-owned, contractor-operated service will be used for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance in support of Coast Guard missions. Requirements for the cutter-based UAS capability – which the Coast Guard will term as maritime UAS or MUAS in the future – included fully automated flight operations, minimum endurance of 12 hours of flight time daily and the ability to provide services 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The payload will include electro-optical and infrared sensors and communications relays and be capable of providing surveillance, detection, classification and identification for all of the host cutter’s operational missions.

The contract has a total potential value of $198.1 million and includes installation and deinstallation of the UAS capability and pilot and mission training. Shield AI will deploy its V-BAT, which is a vertical take-off and landing UAS.

Initially, the contract will be used to continue UAS capability on the national security cutter class; however, the contract can be used to support additional cutter classes in the future.

For more information: Unmanned Aircraft Systems Program page

“Coast Guard Cutter Charles David Jr. holds Change of Command ceremony” –CWOs Commanding

Capt. Jason Ingram, Coast Guard Sector Key West commanding officer, presides over a change of command ceremony for USCGC Charles David Jr. (WPC 1107), in Key West, Florida, June 27, 2024. Chief Warrant Officer Adam Smith relieved Chief Warrant Officer Chad Barber as commanding officer ensuring continuity of leadership and operations aboard the cutter. (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Ens. Tabitha Martinez)

Below is a news release. I don’t normally pass along press releases regarding changes of command. They are well covered by Coast Guard News if you want to see them. I thought this was a bit unusual. USCGC Charles David, Jr. is a 154 foot patrol craft with a crew of 24. These are usually commanded by a Lieutenant or Lieutenant Command (O-3 or O-4). Command of one of these by a Chief Warrant Officer is an opportunity unique to the Coast Guard.USCGC Charles David (WPC-1107)

June 27, 2024

Coast Guard Cutter Charles David Jr. holds Change of Command ceremony

KEY WEST, Fla. — Chief Warrant Officer Adam R. Smith relieved Chief Warrant Officer Chad M. Barber as commanding officer of Coast Guard Cutter Charles David Jr., Thursday, during a change-of-command ceremony at Coast Guard Sector Key West.

Capt. Jason Ingram, Sector Key West commander, presided over the event.

Chief Warrant Officer Barber was the commanding officer of the cutter since July 2021, conducting 25 patrols and accumulating over 5,000 hours underway. He will transfer to the Coast Guard Cutter Alex Haley, home ported in Alaska. Chief Warrant Officer Smith takes command of the cutter after serving as the Officer in Charge of Station Provincetown, Massachusetts.

“Thank you to Chief Warrant Officer Barber’s family, his spouse Shannon, two sons Hayden and Logan, and his daughter Bryn, for their support while he served his community in the Florida Keys,” said Capt. Jason Ingram, commander, Sector Key West, .

Cutter Charles David Jr. is one of six Fast Response Cutters homeported in Key West and reports to Sector Key West. The cutter patrols over 55,000 square nautical miles of Sector Key West’s area of responsibility within the Florida Straits and the Gulf of Mexico, as well as regularly forward deploying to the Caribbean Sea and other areas in support of the Coast Guard’s national security, law enforcement, and lifesaving missions.

The change-of-command ceremony marks a transfer of total responsibility and authority from one individual to another. It is a time-honored tradition, conducted before the assembled crew, as well as honored guests and dignitaries to formally demonstrate the continuity of the authority within a command.

“New Trend: Transatlantic Narco Submarines” –Covert Shores

On June 26, 2024 Spanish police aboard SVA Fulmar interdicted a narco submarine 200 miles from the Canary Islands. The vessel was carrying 900kg of cocaine. The 4 crew scuttled the vessel before being rescued and arrested.–Covert Shores.

Covert Shores reports what appears to be a trend that self-propelled semi-submersibles are being used to transport cocaine directly from Latin America to Europe based on three interceptions beginning, one in March and two in June.

The use of internal diesel engines rather than outboards should not be surprising, considering they are much more fuel efficient that outboards, for the long distances involved.

Spanish Tax Agency vessel SVA Fulmar. 20 Nov. 2007. Photo credit: Outisnn via Wikipedia

“OVERCOMING THE DELIBERATE LEGAL AMBIGUITY ADOPTED BY CHINA’S COAST GUARD” –Baird Maritime

A still image taken from footage released by the Armed Forces of the Philippines showing China Coast Guard personnel confronting a resupply mission to Scarborough Shoal (Photo: Armed Forces of the Philippines)

Baird Maritime offers an opinion piece, “OVERCOMING THE DELIBERATE LEGAL AMBIGUITY ADOPTED BY CHINA’S COAST GUARD.” It is well done.

I will only say, that in the view of myself and, I believe, most of the rest of the world, there is no ambiguity here. What the China Coast Guard is doing in the EEZs of their neighbors is criminal. It began with the destruction of their neighbor’s natural resources as they build artificial islands destroying natural ecosystems. They claim resources that are not theirs. They drive away local fisherman depriving them of their livelihood. They protect a rapacious Chinese fishing fleet that has overfished their own waters and are now destroying vital natural resources in the waters of their neighbors. They have threatened deadly force to intimidate. They have attacked government vessels conducting peaceful routine operations and injured their crewmembers. Now they are threatening kidnapping.

This is state sponsored theft and piracy and an assault on the expected norms of international behavior. We need a forceful international response.

Metal Shark / Damen Foreign Military Sales Patrol Boat

The NCPV Betelgeuse is docked during a ceremony at La Calderas naval base in Peravia, Dominican Republic, on August 6, 2020. The U.S. is delivering Near Coastal Patrol Vessel (NCPV)s to navies and coast guards in the U.S. Southern Command area of operations. The 85-foot NCPVs are built by Metal Shark at Franklin, La., for the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and other United States partner nations. Photo courtesy Dominican Navy

Back in 2017 I passed along a report from NavyRecognition that Metal Shark had been awarded a contract

“…potentially worth upwards of $54 million, Metal Shark will build up to thirteen 85-foot Defiant-class welded aluminum cutters for the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and other United States partner nations. Additionally, Metal Shark will supply electro-optical infrared sensors, diagnostic equipment, in-country reactivation, crew familiarization, and test support to NCPV (Near Coastal Patrol Vessel–Chuck) operators.

These are referred to as Defiant class patrol vessels.

Found a photo (above) of one in a Marine Link post, “Navy Combat Craft – Boats Evolve to Keep Pace with Threats.” The photo below is from Wikipedia.

The PM-15, a Defiant class patrol vessel the USA gave to El Salvador, in 2021. US State Department photo.

It appears only five of the class were delivered, one each to the Dominican Republic, Honduras, Panama, El Salvador, and Costa Rica. No idea what happened to the contract for the remaining eight.

If it looks familiar, it is because it is an evolution of the Damen design that gave us the Marine Protector class 87 foot WPBs.

“Chinese Submarine’s Torpedo Destroys Amphibious Landing Ship During Exercise” –The War Zone / More on Why the CG Needs Torpedoes

The War Zone has an article including the video above that appears to be a wake homing torpedo exploding under the stern of a small (800 tons, 191′) LST (Landing Ship Tank).

It also includes a discussion of wake homing torpedoes and their capabilities. This is assumed to be a typical heavy weight (21″/533mm) torpedo. Russia and China also have much larger 25.6″/650mm torpedoes. Of course, they have or have had smaller (450, 400, 355, and 330mm) torpedoes too.

Wake homing torpedoes are problematic for the defense because decoys and acoustic countermeasures like Nixie don’t work against wake homing torpedoes. The Navy has been working on developing a hard kill countermeasure.

How is this related to the Coast Guard?

As I have contended the Coast Guard’s missions, particularly counter terrorism, require the ability to forcibly stop any ship regardless of size. For medium to large ships, getting a “mobility kill” with a gun is very difficult since most of the propulsion machinery is below the waterline and large marine diesels are extremely tough.

A torpedo that destroys the propellers and/or rudder may be the answer. It could be either wake or acoustic homing, as long as it blows up under the stern, like the one in the video above.

It is not like the Coast Guard is going to use a lot of torpedoes. A marine terrorist attack is an unlikely event, but the consequences of a successful attack could be catastrophic, perhaps leading to a war as happened after 9/11.

By my calculations, we have 31 individual ports or port complexes that might be targeted. The Webber class WPCs appear the most appropriate asset to arm for the purpose of protecting those ports, since they, are most likely to be underway or at least ready to move, and near the ports that might be threatened. We expect to build a total of at least 67. Assuming two torpedoes per WPC, that would be 134 torpedoes and probably less, since some cutters will not be in a position to use them, and some will be in maintenance status.

This is important.

The Navy does not have to buy torpedoes for the Coast Guard, they just need to loan the Coast Guard torpedoes from war reserve stock, and if a war starts the Navy can have their torpedoes back.

We don’t need the most expensive torpedoes. 

The standard US Navy heavy weight torpedo, the Mk 48, is very large, heavy, and extremely expensive, and the Navy can’t make enough of them, but we don’t necessarily need a large warhead or great range, nor do we need a torpedo that can operate at great depth against submarines.

There are three possibilities for torpedoes that the Coast Guard might use, existing light weight torpedoes, new very light weight torpedoes, or new heavy weight torpedoes.

New Heavy Weight Torpedo: Reportedly the Navy is fast tracking a new heavy weight torpedo with a target price of $500,000, much less than the cost of the Mk48 ($4.2M) and even less than the cost of the Mk54 light weight torpedo ($839,320 in 2014). They don’t say so, but this may be explicitly a wake homing anti-surface vessel torpedo. It might also be smaller than the Mk48. If the torpedo is made significantly shorter than the Mk 48, it might permit Submarines to carry more torpedoes. More war shots would be an advantage.

Mk 46 Light Weight Torpedo

Light Weight Torpedo: For at least three decades as many as 36 US Coast Guard WHECs (aka WPGs) were equipped with light weight torpedoes. Throughout their lives, the 378s had two sets of triple light weight torpedo tubes and a torpedo magazine in the superstructure for additional torpedoes, so the Coast Guard has had these in the past.  At least some Light Weight ASW torpedoes, beginning with the Mk46 Mod5 (1984), still a NATO standard, are reported to have an anti-surface capability. Reportedly 26,000 Mk46 torpedoes, including more than 6000 Mod 5s have been produced. The Navy has also produced more capable Mk50 and Mk54 light weight torpedoes, but for the counter terrorism mission the Coast Guard does not need their additional ASW capabilities.

Very Light Weight Torpedo

Very Light Weight Torpedo: 

The Navy has contracted Raytheon for a new class of torpedo, 6.75″ in diameter (171.45mm), about 85″ in length, and weighing about 220 pounds (100 kilos). More here.

While this Common Very Light Weight Torpedo (CVLWT), also known as Compact Rapid Attack Weapon (CRAW), is reportedly effective in both defense (as an anti-torpedo torpedo) and offense against both surface and subsurface targets, by submarines, surface vessels, and aircraft, the initial purchase is only for US submarines.

We may see additional applications for this weapon. There may be good arguments for increasing the production to include defense for surface vessels and offensive use by ASW helicopters and Unmanned surface and subsurface systems.

While the warhead is only half the size of that for the Mk46 and about one twelfth that of the Mk48, it is probably enough to disable even large ships and its small size means more can be carried in the same space.

A Navy briefing slide showing the internal components and describing the various features of the Penn State University’s Applied Research Lab (PSU/ARL) Common Very Light Weight Torpedo (CVLWT) design

It seems the Navy, after a long period of apparently coasting, is showing renewed interest in developing torpedoes and torpedo countermeasures. In addition to the Common Very Light Weight Torpedo, and the new Heavy Weight Torpedo, the Navy is also developing an improved Light Weight ASW torpedo, the Mk54 Mod2.

New weapons may provide an opportunity to repurpose older weapons.

Philippine Navy Upgraded WHEC

Sharing something I found on Facebook, BRP Andres Bonifacio (PS-17), former USCGC Boutwell, testing their recently added Mark 36 Super Rapid Bloom Offboard Countermeasures Chaff and Decoy Launching System. Upgrades to the Philippine Navy’s three former USCG WHECs are discussed here.

BRP Andres Bonifacio (PS-17) deployed its newly installed Mark 36 Super Rapid Bloom Offboard Countermeasures Chaff and Decoy Launching System during a gunnery exercise in the SCS on June 19. Note modern multimode radar on main mast. Photo from Aaron-Matthew Lariosa.

BRP Andres Bonifacio (PS-17) deployed its newly installed Mark 36 Super Rapid Bloom Offboard Countermeasures Chaff and Decoy Launching System during a gunnery exercise in the SCS on June 19, 2024. Photo from Aaron-Matthew Lariosa.

Thanks to Buddy Stewart who provided link to the source. 

“US Coast Guard Cutter Dauntless celebrated for 56 years’ service during heritage recognition ceremony” –Having Done More than Ever Anticipated

USCGC Dauntless being launched on 21 October 1967.

Below is a press release marking the effective decommissioning of USCGC Dauntless. (Go to the link for photos.) (My comments have been modified from the original publication.)

I have to take issue with a statement in the news release,

“These cutters were designed for search and rescue, law enforcement missions such as counterdrug and migrant interdiction, as well as national defense and international engagement.”

This reflects what the ship has done, but it is a misrepresentation of what was envisioned when the 210s were designed more than 60 years ago. SAR was the primary mission, law enforcement (fisheries) was secondary, but drug and migrant interdiction and international engagement were not the radar at all.

The flight deck was to be used as a “lily pad.” They were not expected to deploy with a helicopter attached.

There is an important lesson here, that adaptability and flexibility are important in the design of an asset that will be used for decades.

Where did I get this?”

I did a post in 2011, “The Coast Guard Shipbuilding Program, 1964” that referenced  an article, “Developments and Problems in Coast Guard Cutter Design,” that appeared in the 1964 US Naval Institute Naval Review (published at that time as a separate hard bound book, copyright 1963, United States Naval Institute, Annapolis, MD, Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 62-21028) that discussed the then new generation of Coast Guard Cutters.

There was no clue drug enforcement would become important. In contrast to the prohibition era the authors noted, “…nor are they (cutters) much concerned with the apprehension of smugglers.”

Intended to replace twenty five 125 ft WSCs, 165 ft WPCs, 143 ft ATAs, 205 ft ATFs, and 213 ft ARS, the considerations that drove the design of the 210s were relatively straight forward, to make “A better rescue ship.” LE was secondary. Military readiness, a distant third, was still considered. The 3″/50 fitted for SAR and Law Enforcement was to be “…augmented for the ship’s wartime role as a coastal patrol vessel….Although their peacetime armament is minimal, space and weight compensation have been provided  for sonar, hedge hog projectors, ASW torpedoes, and additional guns, small rockets, or other armament as may be required.”

We have been repeatedly told the Coast Guard is now in the greatest period of recapitalization since World War II. That is not really true, the Coast Guard commissioned 12 WMECs between 1967 and 1972, 16 WMECs between 1964 and 1969, 79 WPBs between 1960 and 1970, and five WLMs between 1964 and 1971. That is 112 vessels in 13 years 1960 to 1972.

In the last 16 years we have commissioned ten National Security Cutters and 56 Fast Response Cutters, a total of 66 ships. We are planning to add 11 more FRCs and 25 OPCs, for a total of 102 ships, but in the 60s we had planned to build 36 WHEC378s and 29 WMEC210s, which would have brought that total to 149 vessels.

Replacing all of our ships in huge programs 40 years apart is not a good idea. Where we really need to get to, is building ships continually with constant progressive improvements overseen by an organic design staff.

Since we seem to be dragging out the Offshore patrol cutter program, we may get there for patrol cutters since we really need more than the 36 large patrol cutters and the Bertholf will be 30 years old when the last planned OPC is finished in 2038. We may just continue to build one or two a year indefinitely.

The oldest FRC was commissioned in 2012 and the 67th will probably be commissioned in 2027, so we will not need to replace them for a while, but we have already started decommissioning 87 foot “Marine Protector” class WPBs, nominally because they can be replaced in some roles by the FRCs and Response Boat, Mediums, but in any case, they are reaching the end of their useful lives, the first having been commissioned 26 years ago. We should be designing their replacements now.

To make this work we really need a long-term ship building plan. The Navy already does one. Congress is used to the idea of 30 year plan. That time horizon is not an accident. We should not be keeping ships for more than 30 years. Once they reach that point, they should be passed over to the foreign military sales program to help our friends and allies. Replacing ships at a predictable, realistic threshold will help both the Coast Guard and the shipbuilding industry that is essential for national security. 


PRESS RELEASE | June 21, 2024

NAVAL AIR STATION PENSACOLA, Fla. — The Coast Guard held a heritage recognition ceremony, Friday, in Pensacola to honor the U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Dauntless (WMEC 624) and recognize its 56 years of exemplary service.

The ceremony was presided over by Vice Adm. Nathan Moore, Atlantic Area commander, and served to celebrate Dauntless’ contributions to the service and Nation in the presence of cutter leadership, current and former crew members, families and friends.

The event also marked the ship’s exit from active-duty service for an indeterminate time, placing it in commission, special status. The 210-foot Dauntless operated as a Coast Guard Atlantic Area command asset, based in Portsmouth, Virginia, and was most recently homeported in Pensacola.

Dauntless was built in Lorain, Ohio and commissioned in 1968. The cutter is the 10th of 16 vessels built in the Reliance-class of medium endurance cutters that have operated in the Coast Guard’s fleet. These cutters were designed for search and rescue, law enforcement missions such as counterdrug and migrant interdiction, as well as national defense and international engagement.

Dauntless was named after the inspirational trait, which means to persevere fearlessly. It’s motto, “Sin Miedo,” translated as “Without Fear,” also underscores the same spirit valued by the cutter’s crews. It is the first Coast Guard cutter to bear its name.

Dauntless spent its first 25 years assigned in the Coast Guard Seventh District area of responsibility and was homeported in Miami Beach.

Throughout the cutter’s storied career, it has earned a reputation as one of the nation’s preeminent drug-busting vessels. Of note, Dauntless has over 85 illegal narcotics interdictions to its credit, executing more busts than any other cutter.

On March 8, 1973, Dauntless became the first cutter in history to seize one ton of marijuana after its crew boarded the fishing vessel Big L. The boarding team arrested the master and crew.

Dauntless was also the second cutter in Coast Guard history to seize one million pounds of marijuana, following in the footsteps of U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Steadfast (WMEC 623). This milestone accomplishment earned Dauntless the large gold marijuana leaf painted on its superstructure.

Dauntless responded to the mass Cuban exodus known as the Mariel Boatlift in 1980. Between April 23 and May 13, crew members towed over 25 vessels to safety, rescued eight persons adrift at sea, and conducted 55 search and rescue cases.

President Ronald Reagan visited the cutter on November 17, 1982, and awarded Dauntless with the Coast Guard Unit Commendation. It was the first time in almost 20 years that a sitting U.S. president had visited a Coast Guard cutter.

Dauntless’ most publicized search and rescue case occurred in January 1986. The cutter was first to arrive during the response to the NASA space shuttle Challenger disaster. Serving as the on-scene commander for over a week, crew members tended to safety management and debris recovery.

During the 1980s, Dauntless appeared in two motion pictures. In “The Island,” the cutter is portrayed as a fictitious ‘U.S. Coast Guard Cutter New Hope,’ which is boarded and seized by Caribbean pirates. Dauntless was also featured later in the James Bond film, “License to Kill.”

In June of 1993, Dauntless was decommissioned and underwent an 18-month-long Major Maintenance Availability at the Coast Guard Yard in Baltimore. After its completion, Dauntless relocated to the Coast Guard Eighth District area of responsibility and reported to its new home port of Galveston, Texas in March of 1995.

On November 24, 1995, crew members rescued 578 migrants from a grossly overloaded 75-foot coastal freighter. It was the largest number of migrants rescued from a single vessel in Coast Guard history.

In 2009, Dauntless underwent a second drydock availability at the Coast Guard Yard. During the 10-month period, the cutter received an increase in its long-term capability through equipment upgrades, habitability improvements and structural repairs to improve reliability and drive down costs.

Dauntless relocated to its current home port in July 2018.

In 2022, the cutter received a six-month drydock availability at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in New York City. Dauntless underwent hull restoration and preservation projects, prolonging the ship’s life further.

Recently working alongside the Royal Netherlands navy, Dauntless’ crew seized approximately 8,500 pounds of cocaine and apprehended 13 suspected drug smugglers with Dominican Republic and Colombian nationalities following a 45-day patrol in the Caribbean Sea.

During the cutter’s final patrol this year, Dauntless completed a 61-day deployment in the Windward Passage and Florida Straits. On March 8, crew members conducted a search and rescue case on a moonless night. After searching for several hours, the crew located an unlit, overloaded and disabled sail freighter with 65 Haitian migrants on board, including several children. The crew safely rescued all 65 migrants.

“To the crew, thank you all for the work you put forth in maintaining and operating the Dauntless,” said Vice Adm. Nathan Moore, Atlantic Area commander. “Your work is the heart of what we do as a sea-going service, and your collective energy, work ethic, character and sacrifice is what sets the tone for the sailors that will follow in your footsteps. Although your time on Dauntless is coming to an end, I look forward to your continued leadership and contributions to our Service’s missions and culture as you move on to your next assignments.”

The Dauntless now transitions into an inactive shipyard status as part of the Coast Guard’s greater “AY24 Force Alignment Initiative,” a program to temporarily adjust operations to better reflect the approximate 10% shortage of enlisted members while the Service reassigns personnel and assets to ensure the essential mission readiness demanded by the American public.

This initiative will enable the Coast Guard to meet growing demands for the service’s unique capabilities and authorities during the workforce recruitment and retention challenges facing all U.S. military service branches.

“The Coast Guard cannot maintain the same level of operations with our current shortfall – we cannot do the same with less,” said Coast Guard Commandant Adm. Linda Fagan and Master Chief Petty Officer of the Coast Guard Heath Jones in a joint statement. “Conducting our missions is often inherently dangerous, and doing so without enough crew puts our members and the American public at increased risk.”

Once back at the Coast Guard Yard, Dauntless’ current crew will transfer to different units both ashore and afloat, a step taken to help ensure the Coast Guard’s ability to prioritize lifesaving missions, national security, and protection of the Maritime Transportation System with no degradation to these critical services.

“It has been the honor of a lifetime to have served with the men and women that comprise the exceptional crew of Dauntless,” said Cmdr. Aaron Kowalczk, commanding officer of Dauntless. “This crew embodies the Coast Guard’s Core Values of Honor, Respect, and Devotion to Duty; their dedication to their shipmates, ship, and country is inspiring. In my 13 months on board, I have seen them serve with distinction, protecting the homeland, enforcing our laws at sea, and saving lives. Every day they remind me of our cutter’s motto, “Sin Miedo,” as they face every challenge and obstacle ‘Without Fear’. They have written an epic final chapter to close Dauntless’ 56 historic years of dedicated service to America.”

Dauntless is a 210-foot, Reliance-class medium endurance cutter with a crew of 62. Since commissioning in 1968, Dauntless has executed counterdrug and migrant interdiction operations, supported national defense and homeland security missions, and conducted search and rescue missions in support of Coast Guard operations throughout the Western Hemisphere.

More information about the U.S. Coast Guard’s AY24 Force Alignment Initiative can be found here.

For information on how to join the U.S. Coast Guard, visit GoCoastGuard.com to learn about active duty, reserve, officer and enlisted opportunities.

Information on how to apply to the U.S. Coast Guard Academy can be found here.

“Coast Guard starts fourth phase of work to extend Polar Star’s service life” –CG-9

Below is a news release from the Acquisitions Directorate (CG-9).


Coast Guard starts fourth phase of work to extend Polar Star’s service life

Coast Guard Cutter Polar Star docks at Mare Island Dry Dock in Vallejo, California, on April 3, 2024, for the fourth phase of its service life extension program. U.S. Coast Guard photo.


The Coast Guard has initiated the fourth of five planned phases of Coast Guard Cutter Polar Star’s service life extension program (SLEP). The work is part of the In-Service Vessel Sustainment Program and is being completed at Mare Island Dry Dock in Vallejo, California.

The SLEP is being conducted in phases to take advantage of the planned maintenance availabilities that follow the cutter’s annual deployment to the polar regions. Polar Star completed a 138-day deployment to Antarctica, including operating for 51 days below the Antarctic Circle, in support of Operation Deep Freeze 2024, the annual joint military logistics mission to support the National Science Foundation, the lead federal agency with responsibility for management of scientific research that comprises the U.S. Antarctic Program. Polar Star and crew contribute to this yearly effort through icebreaking to clear the channel for supply vessels.

Phase 4 work began on April 1, 2024, and targets three systems:

  • The heating, ventilation and air conditioning system is undergoing a refurbishment/overhaul of the ventilation trunks, fans and heaters that supply berthing areas of the ship.
  • All of the boiler support systems will be recapitalized/redesigned, including the electrical control station that is used to operate them.

A complete recapitalization/redesign of the flooding alarm system will occur from bow to stern to monitor machinery spaces for flooding.

The boiler system of Coast Guard Cutter Polar Star, which will receive a recapitalization/redesign. U.S. Coast Guard photo.


A section of the heating, ventilation and air conditioning system, which is undergoing a refurbishment/overhaul of the ventilation trunks, fans and heaters that supply berthing areas of the ship. U.S. Coast Guard photo.


This phase of the SLEP is scheduled to be completed by August 2024 to enable Polar Star to meet its commitment to Operation Deep Freeze 2025.

The Polar Star SLEP addresses targeted systems such as propulsion, communication and machinery control systems for recapitalization. Major maintenance extends the service life of Polar Star beyond that of its original design. By replacing obsolete, unsupportable or maintenance-intensive equipment, the Coast Guard is mitigating the risk of lost operational days due to unplanned maintenance or system failures. The contracted SLEP work items and recurring maintenance is taking place within a five-year, annually phased production schedule running from 2021 through 2025.

Polar Star is the Coast Guard’s only active heavy polar icebreaker. The Coast Guard is investing in a new fleet of polar security cutters that will sustain the service’s capabilities to meet mission needs in both the Arctic and Antarctic regions.

For more information: In-Service Vessel Sustainment Program page and Polar Security Cutter Program page.

“First Look At Houthi Kamikaze Drone Boat That Struck Cargo Ship In Red Sea” –The War Zone

Houthi Kamikaze Drone Boat That Struck Cargo Ship in Red Sea, peopled with dummies. 

The War Zone reports,

“The Houthi’s crude uncrewed surface vessel…featured human dummies and approached the ship while security took no defensive action.”

While the Houthi have made several attempts to use kamikaze Unmanned Surface Vessels, this is their first successful in a long time. Deception was the key to success. The attack craft was not small, fast, or highly maneuverable. The attack was not made under cover of darkness. It just looked like all the other local traffic. There is probably a lesson here.