Canadian SAR Aircraft, C-27J a Leading Contender

DehavillandCC-115Buffalo01
442 Transport and Rescue Squadron De Havilland Canada DHC-5 Buffalo (CC-115)

Canada’s military seems to be having a lot of trouble with their procurement, new naval helicopter, new patrol vessels, and new SAR aircraft All have taken much longer than expected.

DefenseIndustryDaily reviews the status of their program to replace their existing SAR aircraft which are now overworked DHC-5 (CC-115) Buffalo on the West Coast and CC-130E/H Hercules on the East Coast, in the works since 2008.

According to the report, the C-27 appears to be the most likely choice, other contenders include the HC-144’s big brother the EADS-CASA C295, the C-130J, the Bombardier DASH-8, the DHC-5NG Buffalo being resurrected by Viking Air Ltd., and the Bell V-22.

CG issues Draft RFP for Second Phase of FRC Procurement

page1-640px-USCG_Sentinel_class_cutter_poster_pdf

The Acquisition Directorate is reporting that they have issued a draft Request for Proposal (RFP) for a new contract to build Webber class WPCs.

It will provide for options of either four or six cutters per year for seven years. If all options were exercised the maximum number of cutters that could be built would total 42, but this probably will not be the case.

In February 2012, the Coast Guard exercised a $27.2M option to purchase the “Procurement and Data License Package” for the Webber class Fast Response Cutters, so the Coast Guard can allow other shipyards to bid to build follow-on ships of the same class.

25 September 2013, the Coast Guard exercised an option for six more cutters. This resulted in a total 24 Webber class built or under contract. I believe this was FY2013 money and we will see another contract to exercise the final option on the existing contract bringing the total to 30, which leads to a question. There is a statement in the RFP that I find difficult to understand, B.2.(b) “The total number of cutters obtained under this contract will be limited to twenty-six (26).” All along the program of record has been 58 of these vessels. The maximum number of vessels that can be funded under the phase one contract is 30 cutters so why limit this second contract to 26 when we have a stated requirement for 28 more? Does the Coast Guard plan on making a sole source buy of two ships in FY2015 and award this contract in FY2016?

Why preemptively limit the buy to less than the total of the options anyway. There might be a change of plans that would increase the Coast Guard requirement. The Navy might want to buy some using our existing contract, or the Coast Guard might want to make a Foreign Military Sale purchase on behalf of a friendly foreign government.

Despite being probably the best candidate we will ever see (a mature program with a proven product, approved by the Department for full rate production, that will continue for at least another five years), I saw no indication that a multi-year procurement was considered. I would hope that savvy ship builders would offer this as an additional option. It is still not too late for the Coast Guard to obtain Congressional permission to award a Multi-year Procurement for these ships. Or for Congress to direct this money saving procurement method.

Canadian Coast Guard’s New Shipboard Helicopter

Bell B429

Defense Industry Daily is reporting the Canadians have selected the Bell B429 as their new shipboard Coast Guard helicopter

“The request for proposals closes on May 27, but rivals AgustaWestland, Airbus Helicopters Canada and Sikorsky have all signalled they won’t be submitting bids, leaving Bell and its model 412 chopper (actually the B429–Chuck) as the only contender…. The companies declining to take part are doing so because their aircraft are heavier than the maximum of 4,989 kilograms (11,000 pounds), a safety limit established for the decks of coast guard ships in the 1970s.

Industry sources said at least one potential bidder expressed concern that the standard was outdated and asked the federal government for data on how the weight restriction was calculated. The intention was to prove the decks could handle higher ratings, but officials just came back and said the standard was the standard.”

The Bell B429 is a twin engine helicopter with the capability of allowing single pilot flight in IFR (instrument flight rules) conditions, designed for the medivac market. It is about 2000 pounds lighter than the MH-65 but is otherwise similar in performance. There are a number of door options including clamshell doors in the rear and an option for retractable wheeled landing gear.

Australia, Does it Need a Coast Guard?

In Australia most coast guard functions are handled by the Navy and Air Force. DefenceIQ has an interesting discussion of this alternate arrangement of responsibilities and its shortcomings.

I also note the Australian Navy and their Customs service both operate similar patrol vessels, the Armidale class and the Cape class, and if anything the Customs’ Cape class are more capable.

Thanks to Lee for bringing this to my attention.

DefenseNews–Interview with Admiral Papp

DefenseNews has a short interview with outgoing Commandant, Admiral Papp. Generally nothing too surprising except perhaps the statement that he wrote fitness reports for all the CG flag officers every year and followed it up with counseling, certainly an onerous if extremely important task.

Overall an interesting and relatively short read.

I think I’m going to miss Admiral Papp.

Ireland’s New OPV, Samuel Beckett

Thought I had posted about this ship earlier, but could not find it, if I did. At any rate our friend at Think Defence has done a nice write up. This class (90 meters), may be the evolutionary immediate predecessor of Eastern’s OPC proposal, being a development of the New Zealand Protector class OPV (85 meters), which was in turn a development of the Irish Róisín Class (80 meters). The Samuel Beckett class is notable for their low cost, hybrid propulsion, and small crew size.

Russia Builds an OPC

NavyRecognition is reporting the launch of the first for a class of ships being built for the Maritime Border Guards of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB, successor of the KGB). The ship is similar in many respect to the projected Offshore Patrol Cutter.

Named “Ocean,” she is reportedly ice strengthened with a displacement of 2,700 tons, a speed of 20 knots, a range of 12,000 miles, and a 60 day endurance. She has a hangar and flight deck, at least two RHIBs, and a 76mm gun. Unlike previous classes used by the Maritime Boarder Guards this is not an adaptation of a Navy design.

South Korea Disbands Coast Guard?

Versions of the following quotation are frequently mis-attributed to Petronius.
We trained hard … but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganized. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganizing; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization.
In fact it is from the magazine article “Merrill’s Marauders” (Harper’s Magazine, 1957) that earned Ogburn (Charlton Ogburn) his book contract. In full, it reads thus:
We trained hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganised. Presumably the plans for our employment were being changed. I was to learn later in life that, perhaps because we are so good at organising, we tend as a nation to meet any new situation by reorganising; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency and demoralization. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlton_Ogburn

After the sinking of the ferry Sewol with the loss of over 300, South Korea’s President Park Geun-hye is vowing to dismember the South Korean Coast Guard.

South Korea’s EEZ is only about three percent that of the US’s but their Coast Guard is relatively large with about 4,500 personnel (according to my Combat Fleets of the World). Wikipedia indicates they have six fixed wing and 18 helicopters (not a lot, but proportionately more than the USCG). Most surprisingly, they have 33 ships of over 1000 tons with a total displacement greater than that of all USCG WMECs, WHECs, and WMSLs combined. They also have 39 WPCs of 250 to 500 tons. I don’t see any evidence that they have any responsibility for Aids to Navigation, Alien Migrant Interdiction (although that might be a subset of another mission} or ice operations, otherwise their mission set seems to parallel that of the USCG, but their priorities are shaped by the proximity of North Korea, China, and Japan.

The New York Times reports their President sees the problem as a cozy relationship between regulators and the regulated, something all regulatory organizations must guard against.

With that, she declared a war against what she called her country’s deeply entrenched culture of “kkiri kkiri,” or collusive ties between businesses and government regulators that she said had spawned lax regulatory enforcement and an easy acceptance of poor safety standards throughout the society.

The BBC reports,

Ms Park added that in its current form, the coastguard would be unable to prevent another large-scale disaster.

“The coastguard continued to get bigger in size but did not have enough personnel and budget allocated for maritime safety, and training for rescue was very much insufficient,” she said, according to Reuters.

Stars and Stripes has some very revealing statistics regarding the experience of South Korean Coast Guard Personnel.

Eleven out of the 13 coast guard chiefs named since 1996 have been land-based police officers, not coast guard officers; the top 14 current coast guard officers have no experience working as captains for 1,000-ton-class ships or bigger vessels; and about 25 percent of its top 67 officers have had less than one month of experience working on patrol ships, the coast guard said, confirming reports published by lawmakers.

It really appears that the problem is not the fact that they have a Coast Guard, but that it has been mismanaged and unprofessional. Clearly their Coast Guard is big enough, but it suffers from a leadership that does not understand the Marine environment and that will not be helped by the proposed reorganization. I am afraid the proposed reorganization will only provide the appearance of action while failing to address the very real problems.

They might benefit from more time spent with the US Coast Guard.